Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] GNSO Council Meeting Transcript: Charter Discussion

[Nuno Garcia <ngarcia@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear all, unfortunately I will be driving at this time, and thus I have to
fail to attend this meeting.

My apologies.

Warm regards,

Nuno Garcia


On 9 September 2013 17:30, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> Unfortunately I will be on a plane at the time of our next meeting.  So
> apologies
>
> Julie Thanks for sending the council info.
>
> One of the things that I got out of the GNSO discussion was that even if
> we maintain the full consensus vote threshholder for an SCI recommendation,
> that does not mean that the group can't decide to send a deadlock report to
> the council if that were to happen.  I think this report would still
> require full consensus agreement, but I do not see that as a problem as
> long as everyone's viewpoint was accurately portrayed.
>
>
> avri
>
>
>
>
> On 9 Sep 2013, at 11:42, Julie Hedlund wrote:
>
> > Dear SCI members,
> >
> > Here are the links to the transcript and the chat transcript from the
> GNSO Council meeting held on 05 September.  Please see the discussion
> beginning on page 92 concerning the SCI role and charter.  Wolf-Ulrich
> Knoben may also wish to share his thoughts on the discussion.
> >
> > http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/transcript-council-05sep13-en.pdf
> > http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/transcript-chat-council-05sep13-en.pdf
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Julie
> >
> > Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
>