[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 10 September 2013

[Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear All,


The next Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation meeting will be held 
on Tuesday 8 October 2013 at 1900 UTC.

Please find the MP3 recording of the Standing Committee on Improvements 
Implementation meeting held on Tuesday,  10 September 2013 at 19:00UTC.
http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-20130910-en.mp3

On page:
http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#<http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#oct>sep
(transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page)

Attendees:

Ronald Andruff - Commercial and Business Users Constituency - Primary - Chair
Angie Graves - Commercial and Business Users Constituency - Alternate
Mikey O'Connor  - ISPCP - Alternate
Anne Aikman-Scalese - IPC Primary
Ken Bour -  guest speaker
Jennifer Wolfe - NCA primary
Amr Elsadr - NCUC Alternate
James Bladel - Registrar Stakeholder Group - Primary
Ray Fassett - Registry Stakeholder Group - Primary
Jennifer Standiford - - Registrar Stakeholder Group - Alternate
Ken Bour - Guest
Greg Shatan - IPC -

Apologies:
Nuno Garcia - NCUC - Alternate
Avri Doria - Non Commercial SG - Primary - Vice-Chair

ICANN Staff:
Marika Konings
Julie Hedlund
Mary Wong
Nathalie Peregrine


** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **

Let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
 Nathalie Peregrine
For GNSO Secretariat

Adobe Connect chat transcript 10 September 2013:

   Jennifer Wolfe 2:Is there a separate phone dial in?

  Bladel:US:  866-692-5726  Passcode SCI

  Jennifer Wolfe 2:Thank you!

  Amr Elsadr:Just dialled in. Hi.

  Julie Hedlund:Thanks Amr!

  Amr Elsadr:Avri can't make it today.

  Amr Elsadr:Yup. On a plane.

  Nathalie  Peregrine:Yes, Avri is an apology

  Angie Graves:I am Ron's alternate--will be glad to run mtg if need be

  Ron A:Thanks for pitching in, Angie...;o)

  Mike O'Connor:Bladel's a registrar

  Amr Elsadr:The council member didn't vote at all thinking he had a COI.

  Amr Elsadr:..., then realizing he didn't.

  Marika Konings:@ Anne - apologies for simplifying the scenario.

  Marika Konings:@Anne - who would make that evaluation?

  Marika Konings:whether the motion is the same or different?

  Mike O'Connor:James -- Here's the one that dropped off the list as of June  - 
4)  Allow a councilor to ask for the re-submission of the motion to betaken off 
the consent agenda and to request a Council vote on whether toaccept the 
re-submission.

  Julie Hedlund:@Anne: Do you have some language to suggest?

  Anne Aikman-Scalese:@Ron - it's two resubmissions, not three

  Ron A:Thanks Anne, that is my understanding

  Mary Wong:Just a note: the original problem that created this issue was how 
to prevent any person/group from resubmitting an identical motion in order to 
change the outcome of a previous vote. That may be narrower than what the 
discussion is about right now.

  Greg Shatan:Why is that a problem?

  Amr Elsadr:Got disconnected.

  Mike O'Connor:kudos to Anne for working that one!

  Nathalie  Peregrine:Amr, would you like a dial out

  Amr Elsadr:Sorry about that. Am now on the call again.

  Anne Aikman-Scalese:Thanks Mikey

  Amr Elsadr:I'll send my comment to the list.

  Ron A:Amr are you now back on the call? Is your hand up?

  Amr Elsadr:Yes and yes. :)

  Ron A:Thank you.

  Julie Hedlund:To Amr's point, this is what Avri sent to the SCI list 
yesterday on this issue: One of the things that I got out of the GNSO 
discussion was that even if we maintain the full consensus vote threshholder 
for an SCI recommendation, that does not mean that the group can't decide to 
send a deadlock report to the council if that were to happen.  I think this 
report would still require full consensus agreement, but I do not see that as a 
problem as long as everyone's viewpoint was accurately portrayed.

  Amr Elsadr:Is anything expected of us on this topic at this point??

  Julie Hedlund:@Amr: I think the Council expects the SCI to send its revision 
of the charter, but without making changes to the decision-making procedure.

  Amr Elsadr:@Julie..., that's what I gathered. ..., unfortunate though, 
because it seems Council will make some sort of decision on this which will be 
reflected in the SCI's new charter.

  Marika Konings:@Amr - that is the privilege of the chartering organization ;-)

  Amr Elsadr:@Marika: True... :) ..., I still wish we could have agreed as a 
group to give a unified recommendation.

  Amr Elsadr:@Mikey: I put one in too. :)

  Amr Elsadr:It's a big WG. :)

  Amr Elsadr:I'll reach out to a few as well.

  Jennifer Wolfe:I apologize I have to jump onto a 4 p.m. call.  I look forward 
to continuing the discussion in email and in our next meeting.

  Ron A:Thank you jennifer

  Anne Aikman-Scalese:@Ron - I also have a 1:00 pm conference call AZ time and 
will drop off but hopefully Greg can stay on and let me know about the rest of 
the discussion.  I will be sure to propose alternative language in relation to 
Resubmssion of a Motion.  Thank you everyone .  Anne

  Bladel:Thanks, Ron & Team!

  Amr Elsadr:Thanks everyone. Bye.

  Wolf Knoben:By all!

  Wolf Knoben:I mean Bye

  Julie Hedlund:Goodbye everyone!