<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Action: Re-Submitting a Motion
- To: Jen Wolfe <jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Action: Re-Submitting a Motion
- From: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:44:36 +0200
Hi Jen,
There is one thing that I feel needs to be noted in the sequence of the events
of this particular incident:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Jen Wolfe <jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As additional background, the instance which prompted this issue to be
> considered was one where a councilor abstained from a vote because of a
> potential conflict of interest on the motion. When a question was raised as
> to why he abstained, it was concluded he did not need to abstain because
> his SOI covered the conflict issue. The request was then made to either cast
> another vote or resubmit the motion. No one objected to resubmitting the
> motion and resubmitting the motion for a vote did not change the substantive
> outcome.
The request to either cast another vote or resubmit the motion was not made
directly following the voting, but at the very end of the meeting. By then, a
few councillors had already dropped off the call. My impression at the time was
that there might have been an objection to the resubmission of the motion had
that not been the case, with all the councillors being present. This was a
while back though, so please correct me if I am mistaken.
Thanks.
Amr
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|