ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-improvem-impl-sc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: SCI Charter Revisions

  • To: julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx, gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: SCI Charter Revisions
  • From: Ron Andruff <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:50:09 -0400

Thank you, Julie. That clarifies the matter.

Kind regards,

RA



Ron Andruff
www.lifedotsport.com 

-------- Original message --------
From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> 
Date: 10/18/2013  10:57  (GMT-05:00) 
To: Ron Andruff <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: SCI Charter Revisions 
 
Ron,

In order for the motion to be on the table for the meeting on the 31st it must 
be submitted by Monday the 21st.  This does not preclude, however, the Council 
from having the discussion on the methodology at the meeting on the 31st.  It 
just means that if the Council agrees on the methodology in its discussion on 
the 31st it will also be able to approve the charter (revised or not) also 
during that meeting.  The Charter can be revised (if necessary) following that 
discussion and submitted for approval during the same meeting.  

If the motion is not submitted by the motion deadline then the Council would 
not be able to approve the charter on the 31st, but would have to wait until 
the next meeting (Buenos Aires) to do so.

Best regards,
Julie

From: Ron Andruff <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, October 18, 2013 10:51 AM
To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: SCI Charter Revisions

Thank you, Julie, Wolf-Ulrich,
 
Having reviewed the motion, it appears to be in order with one caveat; I 
believe that it is imperative that the GNSO Council come to a final 
determination on the decision-making methodology before the motion is 
introduced.  That may well be the intention and your understanding, but I did 
want to flag that for clarity.  No point in voting on a ‘half-baked cake’, as 
it were.
 
The SCI looks forward to hearing the outcome of the Council October 31st 
meeting.
 
Kind regards,
 
RA
 
Ron Andruff
RNA Partners
www.rnapartners.com
 
From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 09:31
To: Ron Andruff; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: SCI Charter Revisions
 
Dear Ron and SCI members,
 
Wolf-Ulrich has agreed to submit the attached motion for consideration by the 
Council at its meeting on 31 October for approval of the charter.  At its 
meeting the Council also will discuss the decision-making methodology, so it is 
possible that the Council may revise the charter prior to its approval.  I will 
update you on 31 October as to the outcome of the discussion, and whether the 
charter is revised and/or


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy