Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: REMINDER: Actions/Next Meeting is 03 December

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Re:  Email voting: Avri Doria and Thomas Rickert will work on an approach.

I am afraid I have only just thinking about it, and have not spoken to Thomas

So, just so I won't have done nothing:

Hi Thomas,

In thinking about this, a need to make sure we don't lose track of the 
principle that says all issues must have adequate discussion.

Some initial questions.

-  must this be done on a tele-conference or some similar synchronous activity, 
or can it be via email or some other asynchronous process.
-  can a call for such a vote be done on email and what sort of process works 
for that?  Or must the call be made in a quota-met mtg.
-  would such a call need to be a consensus call?

- could we use the current procedures for an incomplete vote continued online, 
or would we need a new procedure.

- how often does this need to happen?  Does it need to happen?

What do you think?

Cheers,

Oh, and I can only do the first half of the meeting.

Avri Doria

Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Greg,
>
>Thank you very much Greg.  I will post both documents to the wiki and
>also
>make them available in the Adobe Connect room for display during our
>call
>later today.
>
>Best regards,
>Julie
>
>Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
>From:  <Shatan>, "Gregory S." <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date:  Tuesday, December 3, 2013 3:24 AM
>To:  Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>,
>"gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
>Subject:  RE: REMINDER: Actions/Next Meeting is 03 December
>
>All:
> 
>With apologies regarding the timing, I have attached a revised version
>of
>the proposal regarding resubmission of a motion.  This revised draft
>captures (or at least, tries to capture) the discussion at the October
>meeting of the SCI.  A track changes version is also attached, although
>it
>is easier to read the clean version.  Please note that the IPC has not
>yet
>had the opportunity to consider this version, though some of the
>concepts
>have been discussed; I hope to have some feedback from the IPC by the
>time
>of the meeting.
> 
>Best regards,
> 
>Greg
> 
>Gregory S. Shatan
>Deputy Chair | Tech Transactions Group
>IP | Technology | Media
>ReedSmithLLP
>The business of relationships
>599 Lexington Avenue
>New York, NY 10022
>212.549.0275 | Phone
>917.816.6428 | Mobile
>212.521.5450 | Fax
>gshatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>www.reedsmith.com 
> 
> 
> 
>
>From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie
>Hedlund
>Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 2:43 PM
>To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER: Actions/Next Meeting is 03
>December
> 
>
>Dear SCI members,
>
> 
>
>Please see the actions from the meeting on 16 November 2013. These
>actions
>are due prior to the next meeting, which is scheduled for 03 December
>20:00
>UTC for 1 hour (12:00 PST , 15:00 EST,  20:00 London, 21:00 CET ‹ see
>the
>separate notice with teleconference information).
>
> 
>
>Best regards,
>
>Julie
>
> 
>
>Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
> 
>
>1.  Re-Submission of a Motion: IPC will provide language prior to the
>next
>SCI meeting.
>
> 
>
>2.  Email Voting: Avri Doria and Thomas Rickert will work on an
>approach.
>
> 
>
>3.  Exceptions/Waivers: Mikey O'Conner and Marie-Laure Lemineur will
>develop
>language on an approach for guidance to the Chair.
>
> 
>
>4.  Timing of meetings/Next: Consider bimonthly meetings if necessary;
>schedule the next meeting in two weeks and continue to consider the
>question
>of how frequently to hold meetings.
>
> 
>
>5. Work Management: Assign Subgroups/Staff to Provide Wiki Templates
>
> 
>
>* * *
>
>This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered confidential and
>may
>well be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are
>on
>notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and
>then
>delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it
>for
>any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you
>for
>your cooperation.
>
>* * *
>
>To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we inform
>you
>that, unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax
>advice
>contained in this communication  (including any attachments) is not
>intended
>or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1)
>avoiding
>penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state and local
>provisions or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party
>any
>tax-related matters addressed herein.
>
>Disclaimer Version RS.US.20.10.00