<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Waivers/Exceptions to GNSO Operating Procedures: Revised Draft
- To: "'Marika Konings'" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Waivers/Exceptions to GNSO Operating Procedures: Revised Draft
- From: "Shatan, Gregory S." <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 16:13:27 +0000
I should probably be more specific about the reason for that statement - it is
really aimed at the "resubmission of a motion" rule. I want to be clear that a
late motion that doesn't get through this process does not have a "strike"
against it in the resubmission of a motion rule.
From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 4:34 AM
To: Shatan, Gregory S.; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Waivers/Exceptions to GNSO Operating
Procedures: Revised Draft
Thanks, Greg. I'm still not clear to why it would say 'For the avoidance of
doubt, if the requirements above are not met, the motion shall not be
considered "submitted"? Why can't it be considered submitted, but just not
eligible to be considered for a vote at the meeting? The current practice is
also that if a motion is submitted after the deadline it may get discussed,
just not voted on during the meeting, but there is no need to resubmit it for
the next meeting as it is already considered submitted and automatically
carried over. Maybe I'm missing something?
Best regards,
Marika
From: <Shatan>, "Gregory S."
<GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thursday 17 April 2014 03:40
To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>"
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Waivers/Exceptions to GNSO Operating
Procedures: Revised Draft
All:
Following up on our last meeting, I attach a revised version of the amendment
to the Operating Procedures dealing with "late" submission of a motion, with my
revisions marked in "track changes."
I look forward to your comments.
Best regards,
Greg
Gregory S. Shatan
Deputy Chair | Tech Transactions Group
IP | Technology | Media
ReedSmithLLP
The business of relationships
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
212.549.0275 | Phone
917.816.6428 | Mobile
212.521.5450 | Fax
gshatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gshatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
www.reedsmith.com<http://www.reedsmith.com>
* * *
This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered confidential and may
well be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on notice
of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete
this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any
purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you for your
cooperation.
* * *
To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we inform you that,
unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax advice contained in
this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to
be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under
the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state and local provisions or (2)
promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters
addressed herein.
Disclaimer Version RS.US.20.10.00
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|