[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Agenda for SCI call on 5 August
Dear SCI members, Although this is pretty obvious, proper process requires that an agenda be sent around prior to a meeting :) As such, here is the proposed agenda for the next SCI call scheduled for Tuesday 5 August: 1. Roll Call/Updates to SOI 2. Discuss and finalize Electronic Voting language (last circulated on 31 July, pending further edits by Greg and any other SCI member) 3. Next steps/next meeting As a reminder, we have not yet circulated the SCI-finalized language on Waiver of the 10-day Motion Deadline, on the understanding that a formal consensus call will be conducted for both that and the finalized E-Voting language at the same time. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx From: <Shatan>, "Gregory S." <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thursday, July 31, 2014 at 7:37 PM To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: Updated Electronic Voting language > I think Section 2 onwards is basically where it needs to be in order to be > proposed as a rule. Section 1.2 and especially Section 1.1 need a little more > help. I will go through this draft and make a few suggestions. > > Greg > > > From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mary Wong > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 11:49 AM > To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Updated Electronic Voting language > > > Hi and thanks for the note, Greg. With the exception of the introductory > sentence at the beginning, I believe the sub group intended that the actual > language be that to be incorporated into or rather, added to the GNSO > Operating Procedures. As such, would the attached updated version help? I¹ve > basically just numbered (or re-numbered) the sections to correspond to the > numbering used in the current GNSO Operating Procedures, with ³xx² to signify > the actual Section number to be allotted to the final version. > > > > Thanks and cheers > > Mary > > > > Mary Wong > > Senior Policy Director > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) > > Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 > > Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > From: <Shatan>, "Gregory S." <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 at 9:08 PM > To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" > <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: Updated Electronic Voting language > > >> >> All: >> >> I am raising a process question with regard to the Electronic Voting language >> as it currently stands. Unlike the 10-day Waiver rule proposal and the >> resubmission proposal (among others), the Electronic Voting language is not >> currently drafted in the form of a rule that can be ³dropped into² the >> Operating Procedures. Instead, it is more of a statement of principles >> (although it has tightened up quite a bit through various drafts). >> >> If we send it out for public comment and review in this form, wouldn¹t we >> then need to revise it to put it in the form of a draft rule, which would >> then go out for a second round of Consensus Call/public comment/GNSO Council >> review, and then (unless there are no issues raised with the drafting of the >> rule), wouldn¹t we need to revise it again to put it in the form of a final >> rule for a third round of Consensus Call/public comment/GNSO Council review >> before it can be adopted? >> >> Would it make sense to revise the Electronic Voting language so that it is >> the form of a rule, which could eliminate a round of review and get the rule >> ³on the books² faster? (Given the evolution of the document, I think we are >> already halfway there.) Or is the issue sufficiently complex that it should >> be reviewed by the community ³in principle² first, before we turn it into a >> rule? Or am I missing something relating to process and procedures? >> >> Best regards, >> >> Greg >> >> >> >> >> From:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mary Wong >> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 6:19 PM >> To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Updated Electronic Voting language >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> >> >> Please find attached an updated draft of the proposed Electronic Voting >> procedure for the GNSO Council, based on the SCI meeting on 22 July. Please >> note also that, after consulting with Ron as the Chair, the finalized >> language for this procedure will be sent out together with the >> previously-approved language for the 10-day Motion Waiver procedure for a >> formal Consensus Call. Following the conclusion of the Consensus Call and >> assuming the two procedures are approved, staff will then prepare to send >> them out - together with the previously-adopted language regarding WG >> Consensus Levels - for public comment and GNSO Council review. >> >> >> >> We will, as per usual practice, also notify and consult with ICANN Legal on >> all these adopted procedures, to ensure that they are in general conformity >> with other rules and processes in the ICANN community. >> >> >> >> Thanks and cheers >> >> Mary >> >> >> >> Mary Wong >> >> Senior Policy Director >> >> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) >> >> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 >> >> Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 at 4:09 PM >> To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Action items: SCI Meeting 22 July >> >> >>> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> >>> >>> Please find below the action items from the call on 22 July. These also are >>> posted to the wiki at: >>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosci/22+July+2014. Our next meeting >>> is scheduled in two weeks on Tuesday, 05 August at 1900 UTC. A separate >>> meeting notice will be sent to the list and will include details concerning >>> remote access. >>> >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> >>> >>> Julie >>> >>> >>> >>> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director >>> >>> >>> >>> SCI Meeting Actions 22 July >>> >>> 1. Waiver of 10-Day Motion Deadline: 1) Put the language out for a formal >>> consensus call (consensus must be unanimous); 2) If consensus is achieved >>> combine with other changes to the Operating Procedures for public comment. >>> >>> 2. Remote/Electronic Voting: 1) Take out "regularly scheduled" in both >>> instances where it appears in paragraph 5; 2) Send the revised language out >>> for consensus call (consensus must be unanimous); 3) If consensus is >>> acheived combine with other changes to the Operating Procedures for public >>> comment. >> >> >> >> * * * >> >> This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered confidential and may >> well be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on >> notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then >> delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any >> purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you for your >> cooperation. >> >> Disclaimer Version RS.US.201.407.01 Attachment:
smime.p7s |