ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-improvem-impl-sc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Consensus Call: SCI Proposals on Waiver & Voting Outside a Council Meeting

  • To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Consensus Call: SCI Proposals on Waiver & Voting Outside a Council Meeting
  • From: Cintra Sooknanan <cintra.sooknanan@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 13:59:08 -0400

Conforming support on behalf of NPOC.

Regards
Cintra Sooknanan
On 8 Sep 2014 00:33, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Just for completeness sake, NCSG supports.
>
> avri
>
> On 05-Sep-14 21:45, Ron Andruff wrote:
> > Thank you, Mary.
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > RA
> >
> >
> >
> > Ron Andruff
> >
> > ONR Consulting, Inc.
> >
> >  <http://www.ICANNSherpa.com> www.ICANNSherpa.com
> >
> >
> >
> > From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
> > Sent: Friday, September 5, 2014 14:22
> > To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Consensus Call: SCI Proposals on
> Waiver
> > & Voting Outside a Council Meeting
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you, Ron! As the deadline has now passed, I am pleased therefore to
> > report that the two proposals are now considered adopted by the SCI by
> > unanimous consensus (as required by the Charter). Staff will make
> > preparations to send the proposals out for public comment as soon as we
> can.
> >
> >
> >
> > In the meantime, and following from the notice of cancellation of the
> > meeting originally scheduled for 9 September next week, please note that
> > staff will also create a new page on the SCI wiki space intended for SCI
> > members to list items proposed for SCI review/discussion at our planned
> > face-to-face meeting in Los Angeles next month. Please look out for a
> > further notice from us once we have set up the page and started to
> populate
> > it with those few items we had noted from previous SCI discussions as
> > warranting either SCI follow up with the GNSO Council or other action.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks, everyone, and have a good weekend!
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Mary
> >
> >
> >
> > Mary Wong
> >
> > Senior Policy Director
> >
> > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> >
> > Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
> >
> > Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Ron Andruff <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
> > Date: Friday, September 5, 2014 at 1:10 PM
> > To: "'Aikman-Scalese, Anne'" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:
> AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> , Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx> >,
> > "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> "
> > <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Consensus Call: SCI Proposals on
> Waiver
> > & Voting Outside a Council Meeting
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear Mary,
> >
> >
> >
> > Please note that the BC also supports the Consensus Calls.
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > RA
> >
> >
> >
> > Ron Andruff
> >
> > ONR Consulting, Inc.
> >
> > www.ICANNSherpa.com <http://www.ICANNSherpa.com>
> >
> >
> >
> > From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> > [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Aikman-Scalese,
> > Anne
> > Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 22:15
> > To: 'Mary Wong'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Consensus Call: SCI Proposals on
> Waiver
> > & Voting Outside a Council Meeting
> >
> >
> >
> > Mary,
> >
> > Greg and I report IPC support for these two amendments, i.e. a vote of
> “yes”
> > for both in the Consensus Call.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Anne
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
> >
> >
> > Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | Suite 700
> >
> >
> > One South Church Avenue | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
> >
> >
> > (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
> >
> >
> >  <mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx |  <
> http://www.lrrlaw.com/>
> > www.LRRLaw.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Lewis and Roca LLP is now Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP.
> >
> >
> >
> > From:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> > [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 8:12 AM
> > To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:
> gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Consensus Call: SCI Proposals on
> Waiver
> > & Voting Outside a Council Meeting
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello again everyone,
> >
> >
> >
> > Just a note to follow up on Ron’s email (below) - we will close the
> > Consensus Call for both topics (Waiver of the 10-Day Motion Submission
> > Deadline and Proposal for Voting Outside a GNSO Council Meeting) this
> Friday
> > 5 September. Please let us know as soon as possible, and no later than
> > Friday, if you or your group have any objections to either proposal. If
> > there are no objections or changes received by Friday 5 September 2014,
> the
> > language will be presumed to be accepted by full consensus.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks and cheers
> >
> > Mary
> >
> >
> >
> > Mary Wong
> >
> > Senior Policy Director
> >
> > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> >
> > Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
> >
> > Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Ron Andruff <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
> > Date: Monday, August 25, 2014 at 4:39 PM
> > To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx> >,
> > "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> "
> > <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Consensus Call: SCI Proposals on
> Waiver
> > & Voting Outside a Council Meeting
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for bringing these Consensus Calls to the list, Mary.
> >
> >
> >
> > This is a reminder to all members that with the first week of this behind
> > us, we have two weeks in front of us before this consensus call is
> > considered closed.
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > RA
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Ron Andruff
> >
> > ONR Consulting, Inc.
> >
> > www.ICANNSherpa.com <http://www.ICANNSherpa.com>
> >
> >
> >
> > From:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> > [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
> > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 17:13
> > To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:
> gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Consensus Call: SCI Proposals on Waiver
> &
> > Voting Outside a Council Meeting
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear SCI members,
> >
> >
> >
> > As agreed on the last SCI call, the following documents are being
> circulated
> > for a formal Consensus Call: (1) the SCI’s proposal to add language to
> the
> > existing Section 3.3 of the GNSO Operating Procedures regarding waiver of
> > the 10-day motion deadline rule; and (2) the SCI’s proposal for a new
> > Section 4.10 to be added to the GNSO Operating Procedures, to deal with
> > voting outside a GNSO Council meeting.
> >
> >
> >
> > Please note that per the SCI Charter, "Unless otherwise determined by the
> > SCI members, committee decisions will be made by “full consensus”
> process as
> > described in the GNSO Working Group Guidelines (see section 3.6).”  As
> such,
> > please review the attached documents with your Stakeholder Group or
> > Constituency (as applicable) if you have not already done so.  If the
> > language is approved the next step will be for staff to prepare a
> redlined
> > version of the GNSO Council Operating Procedures that will be put out for
> > public comment; following which the SCI will review any relevant public
> > comments received. The final step will be submission of the finalized
> > language and proposals to the GNSO Council for its review and adoption.
> >
> >
> >
> > If there are no objections or changes received by Friday 5 September
> 2014,
> > the language will be presumed to be accepted by full consensus.
> >
> >
> >
> > For the attached documents, please note the following minor changes that
> > were made after the last SCI call on 5 August:
> >
> > ?         The format and introductory paragraph to the proposal for the
> > Waiver of the 10-day Motion Rule was amended to conform with the format
> > approved by the SCI for Voting Outside a Council Meeting.
> >
> > ?         The proposed Section number for Voting Outside a Council
> Meeting
> > was changed to Section 4.10 as there already is a Section 4.5 in the
> current
> > GNSO Operating Procedures. By numbering this proposal Section 4.10, it
> will
> > (if adopted) be added to the GNSO Operating Procedures to follow the last
> > current section in the Voting chapter (Section 4.9, regarding a Consent
> > Agenda), without the need to renumber any of the existing Sections in
> this
> > chapter.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Mary
> >
> >
> >
> > Mary Wong
> >
> > Senior Policy Director
> >
> > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> >
> > Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
> >
> > Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >   _____
> >
> >
> >
> > This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> > individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
> > message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
> > agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the
> intended
> > recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> > copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
> > have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
> by
> > replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and
> any
> > attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
> > confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
> > Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
> >
> >
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy