Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan Robinson
Hi Anne, If I recall correctly I think some people raised concerns on the call that they would not be available next week and also that it was a very busy time for various constituencies as they prepare for Singapore. I would respectfully suggest that perhaps you could encourage people to provide their thoughts on the list. In particular, it would be helpful if each primary member could indicate whether he or she supports the letter as is, or if not, suggest changes that would enable them to support it. Best regards, Julie From: <Aikman-Scalese>, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thursday, January 22, 2015 4:01 PM To: 'Avri Doria' <avri@xxxxxxx>, 'Thomas Rickert' <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Wolf-Ulrich Knoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Lori Schulman <lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan Robinson > Thanks Avri. Shall we schedule a call on January 27 to discuss? As per the > mp3, we did not have any disagreement on these points during the call, but we > can certainly set up a call January 27 to discuss. Sounds like we need to do > that. Will staff please proceed accordingly? > Thank you, > Anne > > Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel > Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | > One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 > (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 > AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx | www.LRRLaw.com <http://www.lrrlaw.com/> > > > > > From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 1:11 PM > To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Thomas Rickert'; Wolf-Ulrich Knoben > Cc: Lori Schulman; Julie Hedlund; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx; Glen de > Saint Géry > Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan > Robinson > > Hi, > > Belated apologies for missing the meeting. > > Was there a consensus call on the four issues that are being included? I know > we have not done one on the list and was wondering if one had been taken > during the call. > > A council liaison I would like to know that for my report. I will of course > faithfully faithfully any letter the SCI wishes sent. > > As a primary member I have doubts on whether I would have participated in a > positive consensus on these four items, though I might have allowed them to > pass without comment. Specifically on #3, I have been explicit in not > supporting a review of consensus levels while the GNSO review was ongoing. I > also do not see the point of #2, as we could have done this before but opted > not to. So while I would understand the council requesting such a comment, I > do not understand the SCI asking to redo work it already did and has had > accepted. Yes we had a difference of opinion on whether to include resubmitted > notions and that may have been a good reason to withhold our recommendation. > But since we went ahead, I do not understand the SCI asking to reopen this > issue. > > I can not support the letter as it stands. > > thanks > > avri > > > > I have always been against, number 3, for example until such time as we knew > the results of any reorganizational review. > > On 22-Jan-15 14:07, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> Please see attached the revised letter to GNSO Council based on Tuesday¹s SCI >> conference call. If you have any comments, please supply them to the list >> prior to 1300 UTC Monday, January 26. >> >> Avri, again, as Council liaison for SCI, we are requesting 15 minutes on the >> schedule for Working Sessions in Singapore for you to present this letter to >> Council. (I am unable to attend and SCI will not be meeting separately >> there.) >> >> Thank you, >> Anne >> >> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel >> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | >> One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 >> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 >> AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx | www.LRRLaw.com <http://www.lrrlaw.com/> >> >> >> >> >> From: Thomas Rickert [mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 2:32 AM >> To: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben >> Cc: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; Lori Schulman; Julie Hedlund; >> gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx; Glen de Saint Géry >> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] NCPH Intersessional 2015 Recordings & >> Transcripts >> >> Same here. Sorry! >> >> >> >> Best >> >> Thomas >> >> >>> >>> Am 21.01.2015 um 09:44 schrieb WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> >>> Sorry all that I missed the call! I came back late after the Frankfurt >>> meeting. >>> >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 10:16 PM >>> >>> To: 'Lori Schulman' <mailto:lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx> ; Julie Hedlund >>> <mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> ; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx >>> >>> Cc: 'Glen de Saint Géry' <mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: NCPH Intersessional 2015 Recordings & >>> Transcripts >>> >>> >>> >>> Many thanks Lori. We will revise the draft letter to GNSO Council in >>> accordance with comments received during today¹s meeting. >>> >>> >>> >>> Separately, and specifically directed at Avri as Council liaison, staff >>> advised today that certain SCI matters were put ³on hold² last week by >>> Council. (Thanks Mary for this info.) Staff also advised that it is part >>> of the function of Council liaison to provide SCI with information as to >>> action taken by Council affecting its work. >>> >>> >>> >>> Amr mentioned that GNSO Council meeting minutes are not available until the >>> next GNSO Council meeting and as such, may not be timely. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks everyone who participated in today¹s call. We will be circulating >>> the redraft of the letter soon. We want to be sure our letter and request >>> for time on the Council¹s work schedule for Singapore reaches Council in a >>> timely fashion and preferably well before February 1. >>> >>> Anne >>> >>> >>> <image002.gif> >>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel >>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | >>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 >>> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 >>> AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx | www.LRRLaw.com <http://www.lrrlaw.com/> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx >>> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lori Schulman >>> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:11 PM >>> To: Julie Hedlund; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] NCPH Intersessional 2015 Recordings & >>> Transcripts >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> >>> >>> Below is the link for last week¹s intersessional. I didn¹t find the joint >>> letter re GNSO review posted separately. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=51416553 >>> >>> >>> >>> Lori >>> >>> >>> >>> Lori S. Schulman · General Counsel >>> 1703 North Beauregard StreetAlexandria, VA 22311-1714P 703-575-5678 · >>> Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx >>> <image003.jpg> >>> >>> >>> >>> This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of >>> >>> the person(s) to whom it has been sent, and may contain information that is >>> >>> confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient or >>> >>> have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy, >>> distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments. Please notify >>> the >>> sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message and >>> any >>> >>> attachments. ASCD makes no guarantee that this e-mail is error or virus >>> free. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the >>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this >>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or >>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended >>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or >>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you >>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by >>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any >>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and >>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the >>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the >>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this >>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or >>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended >>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or >>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you >>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by >>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any >>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and >>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the >>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the >>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this >>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or >>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended >>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or >>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you >>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by >>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any >>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and >>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the >>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. >>> Attachment:
image001.gif Attachment:
smime.p7s
|
