<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015
- To: "Rudi Vansnick" <rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015
- From: "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:45:46 -0300
I really welcome your fearlessness, Rudi!
You’ll have my support.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
From: Rudi Vansnick
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 11:59 AM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Cc: Terri Agnew ; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx ; gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx ; Julie
Hedlund
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June
2015
Dear Anne,
Dear all,
As I did not see anyone volunteering for the vice-chair seat, I’m willing to
jump in. Having finished a PDP WG, and ending my ISOC Board mandate, I’m having
some more free time to make available for this task.
See you all in BA.
Best regards,
Rudi Vansnick
Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC)
www.npoc.org
rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxxx
Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
Op 16-jun.-2015, om 15:24 heeft Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> het
volgende geschreven:
Hi Anne,
We have some language that had been previously suggested by Mary and which
also is the language Amr retrieved prior to our meeting. I'm just checking to
see if we want to make any changes to it before we (or Amr) send it to the list.
Thanks,
Julie
From: <Aikman-Scalese>, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 2:14 PM
To: Terri Agnew <terri.agnew@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx"
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04
June 2015
Hi everyone. I had understood that Amr and staff would be working together
to put out a general e-mail asking whether there is a generally favorable view
toward the issue of giving resubmitted motions the benefit of the 10 day waiver
rule and that this general e-mail might include at least some old language
drafted previously by Mary to spark our discussion for this Saturday morning’s
meeting at 7:45 am in the GNSO Council meeting room.
Could staff please advise as to status of this effort?
Thank you,
Anne
<image001.gif> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx | www.LRRLaw.com
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Terri Agnew
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 6:05 PM
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June
2015
Dear All,
Please find the MP3 recording of the Standing Committee on Improvements
Implementation meeting held on Thursday, 04 June 2015:
http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-04jun15-en.mp3
On page:http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#jun
(transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page)
Attendees:
Anne Aikman Scalese – IPC – Primary - Chair
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben – ISPCP - Primary
Rudi Vansnick – NPOC - Primary
Amr Elsadr – NCUC - Primary
Avri Doria – NCSG – Primary
Lori Schulman – IPC - Alternate
Apologies:
None
ICANN Staff:
Julie Hedlund
Mary Wong
Terri Agnew
** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Terri Agnew
Adobe Chat Transcript 04 June 2015
Terri Agnew:Dear all, welcome to the SCI call on the 4th June 2015
Lori Schulman:Where is the mute symbol?
Terri Agnew:Lori your mic isn't active
Lori Schulman:good. I have a bad habit of not muting.
Amr Elsadr:I can hear you Anne.
Terri Agnew:Lost audio, one moment rejoining
Lori Schulman:Am I still disqualified? Are there ever exceptions?
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:is it the wish of anybody (eg council) that the
resubmitted motion should benefit from the rule?
Rudi Vansnick:quid if motion content/context is changed ?
Amr
Elsadr:http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg01201.html
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:sorry Anne, I overread it. It's now clear, thanks
Amr Elsadr:This is the language Mary suggested adding to 3.3.2:
"Resubmitted motions made pursuant to Section 4.3.3 of these Operating
Procedures after the Submission Deadline must meet these requirements in
addition to those detailed in Section 4.3.3 in order to be eligible for
consideration by the GNSO Council under this Section 3.3.2."
Rudi Vansnick:what's the feeling of the councils in this ? in favor ?
Avri Doria:i think clarity was the issue. and the fact that some SCI
members were unhappy with the way our last recommendation had left it. most
were ok with it.
Avri Doria:put after it haad been poked at enough and after the SCI asked
the council to please make this an issue we could work on, we did.
Mary Wong:Yes, per what Amr is saying - first question is whether 10-day
waiver rule can/should apply to resubmitted motions
Rudi Vansnick:if the 10-day waiver is applied, a resubmitted motion could
indefinitely be resubmitted ?
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:@Mary, I thought that is the wish, so it should
happen??
Rudi Vansnick:thanks Mary
Mary Wong:@Anne, that works too - Chair's call :)
Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: I don't think the 10-day waiver rule affects how many
times a motion may be resubmitted.
Julie Hedlund:@Amr and Rudi: I think whether a motion can be resubmitted
is governed by the rules in 4.3.3.
Amr Elsadr:@Anne: Correct.
Amr Elsadr:Thanks Julie.
Mary Wong:Yes, a fresh start
Amr Elsadr:For some reason, I seem to be the only one who thinks we did
actually talk a great deal about this. :)
Avri Doria:Amr, you did talk about it a lot. But there weren't any great
discussions.
Rudi Vansnick:@Mary: +1
Avri Doria:thee were one or two people who kept bringing it up , but the
discussion never stuck.
Amr Elsadr:Greg engaged in this discussion quite a bit. Discussions took
place both on-list and on calls, if I recall correctly.
Mary Wong:@Amr, that's right - there was discussion but people seemed to
have different ideas about what the agreed conclusion was.
Amr Elsadr:@Anne: I'm sorry, could you clarify your concern again. Not
sure I got it.
Rudi Vansnick:perhaps we are now in a state where we need to finalize the
direction
Avri Doria:i'm ambivalent on this issue.
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:staff should draft
Avri Doria:i dont mind allowing them to draft, i am not sure about asking
them to draft.
Lori Schulman:There is no harm in starting drafting. We are not approving
anything.
Julie Hedlund:@Anne: That is correct. The next meeting is in Buenos
Aires.
Lori Schulman:I agree with Mary's point that a draft would be a starting
point only and a good thing to react o.
Lori Schulman:yes. agree.
Julie Hedlund:@Anne: It is the 20th early in the morning.
Mary Wong:The usual "happy" hour :)
Rudi Vansnick:at 7am ? ;-)
Amr Elsadr:@Mary: Happy hour isn't supposed to be all about coffee!!
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Saturday 7:45
Julie Hedlund:@Wolf-Ulright I think that's correct.
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:GNSO starts at 9:00
Amr Elsadr:Am I not getting through?
Terri Agnew:@Amr your audio is cutting out
Amr Elsadr:The way I see it, both the request and the explanation should
be provided.
Mary Wong:@Amr, staff will send you something to review before sending to
the list
Amr Elsadr:@Mary: I'll dig up what I came up with and fwd it to you as
well.
Mary Wong:Gerat, thanks!
Amr Elsadr:BTW..., I won't be in BA, but will participate in the SCI
meeting remotely.
Mary Wong:@Amr, so it's confirmed you can't come? :(
Amr Elsadr:Have personal stuff I need to sort out at that time. Sorry I
won't be there.
Rudi Vansnick:thanks Anne for chairing this meeting
Mary Wong:Sorry we won't see you
Julie Hedlund:@Anne: Mary and I are drafting some slides.
Julie Hedlund:We will send them to you to review.
Amr Elsadr:Thanks Anne and all. Bye.
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Thanks Anne and bye to all
Anne Aikman-Scalese - IPC member:Thank you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message
or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender.
The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be
privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy
Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
<image001.gif>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|