<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER: Consensus Call: Waiver of 10-Day Motion Deadline and Resubmission of Motions
- To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER: Consensus Call: Waiver of 10-Day Motion Deadline and Resubmission of Motions
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:22:11 -0400
Hi,
following Wolf-Ulrich's fine example:
The letter has been shared with the NCSG Policy Committee.
There was no objection.
On behalf of the NCSG: agreed!
avri
On 29-Sep-15 15:00, WUKnoben wrote:
> All,
>
> the letter has been shared with the ISPCP constituency. There was no
> objection.
> On behalf of the constituency: agreed!
>
> Best regards
>
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
>
> *From:* Julie Hedlund <mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 29, 2015 7:51 PM
> *To:* gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject:* [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER: Consensus Call: Waiver of
> 10-Day Motion Deadline and Resubmission of Motions
>
> Dear SCI members,
>
> This is a reminder that the */consensus call /*described below ends at
> */COB today, 29 September 2015. As noted below, i/**/f there are no
> objections or changes received by the deadline/**/, the letter will be
> presumed to be accepted by full consensus./*
>
> Kind regards,
> Julie
>
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
> From: <owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>> on behalf of Julie
> Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:40 AM
> To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>"
> <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Consensus Call: Waiver of 10-Day
> Motion Deadline and Resubmission of Motions
>
>
> Dear SCI members,
>
> As discussed during the SCI call last week on 17 September, please
> see below the proposed letter from the SCI to the GNSO Council on
> the issue of the waiver of the 10-day motion deadline and
> resubmission of motions.
> */
> /*
> */This is a consensus call./*
>
> Please indicate your agreement with, or objection to, the proposed
> letter. */If there are no objections or changes received by
> /**/_COB Tuesday, 29 September 2015_/**/, the letter will be
> presumed to be accepted by full consensus./*
>
> Kind regards,
> Julie
>
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
>
> ------------------------
>
> Dear Jonathan,
>
>
>
> On 05 March 2015 the Standing Committee on Improvements
> Implementation (SCI) submitted to the GNSO Council a Review
> Request (see attached) on the issue of whether the waiver of the
> 10-day deadline for the submission of motions can be applied to
> resubmitted motions. The Review Request was one of two that the
> Council approved at its meeting on 16 April 2015. The SCI is
> continuing to discuss the other Review Request from the Council
> for the SCI to consider codifying the current informal procedure
> for amendments to motions and to recommend any changes SCI
> believes (through full consensus) are appropriate.
>
>
>
> The SCI has determined after a review of the GNSO Operating
> Procedures that by its terms as previously approved by Council,the
> waiver of the 10-day deadline for submission of motions does _not_
> apply to resubmitted motions. Further, after lengthy discussion of
> the possible issues, the SCI is reluctant to make any
> recommendations to change the current status of the Operating
> Procedures given that no instance of a problem arising in this
> regard has occurred. The SCI also notes that although changes to
> the GNSO Operating Procedures are not recommended at this time,
> the SCI could revisit the issue if requested by the Council and,
> specifically, if there is a contentious issue that warrants
> further analysis.
>
>
>
> Please let us know whether you or the Council have any questions
> or require further information concerning the SCI's response to
> this issue request.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Anne and Rudi
>
>
>
> Anne Aikman-Scalese, SCI Chair
>
> Rudi Vansnick, SCI Vice-Chair
>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|