[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: FOR REVIEW: Slides for SCI Update to the GNSO Council

[Lori Schulman <lschulman@xxxxxxxx>]

I am planning on dialing in which I believe is 2am my time.

Lori S. Schulman
Senior Director, Internet Policy
INTA
202-261-6588
________________________________
From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: ‎3/‎4/‎2016 12:02 PM
To: 'Julie Hedlund'<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Amr 
Elsadr'<mailto:aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rudi Vansnick<mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>; Mary 
Wong<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>; Marika 
Konings<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>; 
gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>; 
gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>; Lori 
Schulman<mailto:lschulman@xxxxxxxx>; 
gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: FOR REVIEW: Slides for SCI Update to the GNSO Council

Thanks Julie.  Unfortunately due to the time zone difference, I will not be 
able to attend the SCI meetings and the SCI update to GNSO Council remotely.

 Since being out with bronchitis, it is important for me to get good sleep.   I 
am unsure as to whether Lori plans to participate remotely on behalf of IPC but 
she is copied here.

 I know the meetings are in good hands with Rudi.  Will miss seeing all of you 
in Marrakech and hope to join again in the June meeting.

Thank you all for your hard work.
Anne

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
520.629.4428 office
520.879.4725 fax
AAikman@xxxxxxxx
_______________________________

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
lrrc.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 9:10 AM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Amr Elsadr'
Cc: Rudi Vansnick; Mary Wong; Marika Konings; gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: FOR REVIEW: Slides for SCI Update to the GNSO Council

All,

Here are the final slides with the change suggested by Anne and confirmed by 
Amr.

Thanks!

Julie



On 3/2/16, 3:17 PM, "Julie Hedlund" <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Dear Amr,
>
>I am very sorry that we missed you as a volunteer for the sub teams.  I don’t 
>know how that happened.
>
>Earlier today I submitted on behalf of the two sub teams the reports to the 
>SCI — did you see them?  I will send them directly to you too.
>
>Kind regards,
>Julie
>
>
>
>On 3/2/16, 3:10 PM, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Hi Amr.  Sorry you did not get added.  Subteam B definitely has materials to 
>>submit for full SCI discussion on Saturday and I know Julie plans to forward 
>>this as we have been finalizing the language and topics for discussion.  
>>Wolf-Ulrich  took a leadership role in developing our Subteam B work thus far.
>>Anne
>>
>>Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>>Of Counsel
>>520.629.4428 office
>>520.879.4725 fax
>>AAikman@xxxxxxxx
>>_______________________________
>>
>>Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
>>One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
>>Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>>lrrc.com
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>>Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 1:04 PM
>>To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
>>Cc: Julie Hedlund; Rudi Vansnick; Mary Wong; Marika Konings
>>Subject: Re: FOR REVIEW: Slides for SCI Update to the GNSO Council
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I believe Anne is correct with regards to the order of consensus call 
>>followed by the public comment period. I don’t recall any SCI recommendations 
>>being subject to public comment in the absence of full consensus of the 
>>committee members. Now that I think about it, from a process perspective, 
>>that is rather unfortunate, since it robs the members of the SCI from taking 
>>public comments submitted into consideration before the consensus call is 
>>made.
>>
>>On the other hand, I don’t recall anyone ever submitting a comment on SCI 
>>recommendations, so the point may be practically moot.
>>
>>On another topic…, I was looking at the GNSO calendar a few days ago and 
>>noticed a few SCI sub-team meetings that took place. I thought I had 
>>volunteered for both of those (A & B) on one of our calls, but I may be 
>>wrong. I looked into it, and did notice that my name wasn’t on the list of 
>>sub-team members that was circulated on the SCI email list. Since I failed to 
>>respond, I suppose I have nobody to blame but myself.
>>
>>Are there any plans to provide an update to the full committee on progress 
>>made on those sub-teams? Is that what we will be discussing on Saturday 
>>morning? Perhaps some material shared in advance of Saturday may make the 
>>meeting a little more constructive?
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>Amr
>>
>>> On Mar 2, 2016, at 9:34 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks Julie.  I think the Consensus Call within SCI comes BEFORE putting 
>>> recommendations out for public comment
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>>>
>>> Of Counsel
>>>
>>> 520.629.4428 office
>>>
>>> 520.879.4725 fax
>>>
>>> AAikman@xxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> _____________________________
>>>
>>> <image004.png>
>>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
>>>
>>> One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
>>>
>>> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>>>
>>> lrrc.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 11:58 AM
>>> To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; Rudi Vansnick
>>> Cc: Amr Elsadr; Mary Wong; Marika Konings
>>> Subject: Re: FOR REVIEW: Slides for SCI Update to the GNSO Council
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks so much Anne, that’s a very helpful point.  I’ve updated the slides 
>>> accordingly and attached them.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Julie
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 1:45 PM
>>> To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, Rudi Vansnick 
>>> <rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>, 
>>> Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: RE: FOR REVIEW: Slides for SCI Update to the GNSO Council
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Julie – with regard to Next Steps, I think we have to note that the 
>>> Consensus Call within SCI is required in each case.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>>>
>>> Of Counsel
>>>
>>> 520.629.4428 office
>>>
>>> 520.879.4725 fax
>>>
>>> AAikman@xxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> _____________________________
>>>
>>> <image003.png>
>>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
>>>
>>> One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
>>>
>>> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>>>
>>> lrrc.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:40 AM
>>> To: Rudi Vansnick; Aikman-Scalese, Anne
>>> Cc: Amr Elsadr; Mary Wong; Marika Konings
>>> Subject: FOR REVIEW: Slides for SCI Update to the GNSO Council
>>> Importance: High
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Rudi and Anne,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Mary and I have drafted for your review the attached slides for the SCI 
>>> update to the GNSO Council on copy since as GNSO Council Liaison to the SCI.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Note that I have attached the slides in both PowerPoint and PDF.  You may 
>>> find that if you don’t have view the PDF.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Julie
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
>>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the §2510-2521.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
>>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this 
>>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or 
>>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended 
>>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
>>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you 
>>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
>>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any 
>>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and 
>>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the 
>>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>>
>>This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
>>individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this 
>>message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or 
>>agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended 
>>recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
>>copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have 
>>received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
>>replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any 
>>attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and 
>>confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic 
>>Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message 
or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent 
responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient 
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. 
The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be 
privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the 
intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy 
Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.