<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER: Consensus Call: Current Practice in Relation to Motions
- To: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER: Consensus Call: Current Practice in Relation to Motions
- From: Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:46:09 +0200
Dear Amr,
I prefer asking Julie if it is appropriate to extend the deadline for the
consensus till the 25th. Personally I see no objection, it just covers the
weekend extra.
Julie, can we extend this call ?
Regards,
Rudi Vansnick
> Op 21 apr. 2016, om 12:11 heeft Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> het volgende
> geschreven:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I know that this request is a pain, but I was hoping we could have the
> deadline for this extended…, perhaps until Monday, April 25th.
>
> If folks don’t agree to this, no hard feelings. I won’t hold it against
> anyone. :)
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
>> On Apr 20, 2016, at 4:27 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Dear SCI members,
>>
>> This is a reminder — deadline is 21 April.
>>
>> As agreed on the SCI call on 07 April, the attached document, CONSENSUS
>> CALL-GNSO Operating Procedures Proposed Revision Relating to Motions &
>> Amendments 07 April 2016, is being circulated for a formal Consensus Call.
>> The document is the proposed revision to the GNSO Operating Procedures to
>> include the new text on submitting, seconding, and amending motions.
>>
>> Background:
>> • On 05 March 2015 the SCI submitted to the GNSO Council a Review
>> Request (see attached) concerning the fact that there are currently no
>> formal procedures on (i) whether, how and by whom a properly submitted
>> motion is to be seconded, and (ii) treatment of proposed amendments to such
>> motions as either “friendly” or “unfriendly”. The Review Request was one
>> of two that the Council approved at its meeting on 16 April 2015. In the
>> attached Review Request the GNSO Council asked that the SCI codify the
>> existing customary practices of the GNSO Council and consider new processes
>> to govern the seconding of motions and amendments to motions.
>> • On 09 October 2015 the SCI agreed on a documentation of the Current
>> Practice Relating to Motions and sent a letter (attached) along with the
>> original Review Request and the documentation to Jonathan Robinson, GNSO
>> Council Chair.
>> • In December 2015 the SCI established a Sub Team A — Sara Bockey,
>> Angie Graves, Wolf-Ulrich Knoben, and Lawrence Olawale-Roberts, and Rudi
>> Vansnick — to review the current practice and the Sub Team submitted its
>> recommendations to the SCI on 02 March 2016. The SCI discussed the
>> recommendations in Marrakech on 05 March and asked staff to draft revisions
>> to the GNSO Operating Procedures per the recommendations.
>> • On 07 April the SCI discussed the draft revisions and asked staff to
>> submit them to the SCI for a Consensus Call.
>> If there are no objections or changes received in two weeks by Thursday 21
>> April, the language will be presumed to be accepted by Full Consensus.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Julie
>> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <CONSENSUS CALL-GNSO Operating Procedures Proposed Revision Relating to
>> Motions & Amendments 07 April 2016.docx><CONSENSUS CALL-GNSO Operating
>> Procedures Proposed Revision Relating to Motions & Amendments 07 April
>> 2016.pdf><SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Concerning Current Practice in
>> Relation to Motions 09 Oct 2015.pdf><SCI Review Request - Motions - 5 Mar
>> 2015 v2.pdf>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|