<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Mp3, Attendance & AC Chat from SCI call 19 May 2016
- To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Mp3, Attendance & AC Chat from SCI call 19 May 2016
- From: Michelle DeSmyter <michelle.desmyter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 22:04:38 +0000
Dear All,
Please find the MP3 recording of the Standing Committee on Improvements
Implementation meeting held on Thursday, 19 May 2016:
http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-19may16-en.mp3
On page:http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#may
(transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page)
Attendees:
Anne Aikman-Scalese - IPC - Primary - Vice Chair
Amr Elsadr - NCUC - Primary
Lawrence Olawale-Roberts - BC - Alternate
Lori Schulman - IPC - Alternate
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben - ISPCP - Primary
Angie Graves - BC - Primary
Apologies:
Rudi Vansnick - NPOC -Primary -Chair
Sara Bockey - RrSG - Primary
ICANN Staff:
Mary Wong
Julie Hedlund
Michelle DeSmyter
** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Michelle DeSmyter
Adobe Chat Transcript 19 May 2016
Michelle DeSmyter:Welcome to the Standing Committee on Improvements
Implementation (SCI) meeting held on 19 May 2016 at 18:00 UTC.
Amr Elsadr:Hi Angie.
Lori:I recommend deleting "dealing with"
Lori:unnecessary words
Julie Hedlund:@Lori: Where doe "dealing with" appear?
Lori:Heading of 2.2.1
Julie Hedlund:I'm happy to note the suggested change.
Julie Hedlund:@Lori: Thank you. So we would say, "Procedures for a
situation..."?
Lori:yes.
Julie Hedlund:@Lori: Thank you!
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:agree
Angie Graves:agree
Amr Elsadr:+1
Julie Hedlund:Check marks of agreement from Lori, Amr, Angie, and Anne.
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:ok, understood
Amr Elsadr:@Julie: Sounds good to me.
Julie Hedlund:All, the bracket language to be appended as follows: [no later
than 23h59 Coordinate Universal Time (UTC)]
Julie Hedlund:prior to "14 calendar days"
Julie Hedlund:In both 2 and 3
Amr Elsadr:I have no objection to interim VCs being appointed past the
deadline, but would be concerned that a House would consume more time to
conclude its selection when other important things are happening. We could let
the House make a judgment call on whether this is desirable, or not.
Julie Hedlund:@Amr: Thank you. So, in that case we wouldn't need to put
something in the procedures?
Amr Elsadr:Not so sure about that Julie. The current language doesn't seem to
allow for appointments past the deadline.
Amr Elsadr:The important issue here would be that Council business (including
a second round of elections) not be delayed.
Lori:Anne, would you like me to fill in for you if you need to call the
doctor?
Julie Hedlund:@Anne: If we had consensus language first.
Julie Hedlund:If I recall correctly.
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:@Amr, that's exactly what should be avoided
Lori:Julie can.
Amr Elsadr:@Anne: You're not wrong. :)
Amr Elsadr:@Lori: I also said that I would have concerns with this. ;-)
Lori:ok. I may have conflated the comments.
Lori:Lowered my hand
Lori:Maybe label it Chair Elections?
Amr Elsadr:@Lori: Yes. +1. :)
Julie Hedlund:@Lori: Yes!
Amr Elsadr:I believe the third column is helpful, but shouldn't it give a
better indication of the time available to submit a candidate statement.
Amr Elsadr:..., similar to that pointing out the 30 days for "House Nominee
Selection"?
Amr Elsadr:@WUK: +1
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:ok, I'll send my sugestion to the list
Julie Hedlund:@Anne: I've already noted adding "Chair" in the title of the
section -- thanks!
Julie Hedlund:@Wolf-Ulrich: Thanks so much, very helpful. I just want to
make sure I get it right :-)
Lori:Remarkably, I am free.
Amr Elsadr:Thanks all. Bye.
Lori:Ciao
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:thanks all and bye
Angie Graves:Thank you
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|