<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Mp3, Attendance & AC Chat from SCI call 02 June 2016
- To: Sara Bockey <sbockey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Mp3, Attendance & AC Chat from SCI call 02 June 2016
- From: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 15:46:46 +0200
Hi,
Same here. Not having a calendar invite, I had checked the GNSO Calendar to
confirm that the SCI call was scheduled on June 2nd — just to be sure.
I did however, receive an email notification from Terri on June 2nd for the
June 16th call.
Thanks.
Amr
> On Jun 2, 2016, at 10:53 PM, Sara Bockey <sbockey@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I’ve checked all files and I didn’t receive either of the emails.
>
> Sara
>
> From: Terri Agnew <terri.agnew@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 1:49 PM
> To: Sara Bockey <sbockey@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Lori Schulman <lschulman@xxxxxxxx>,
> Michelle DeSmyter <michelle.desmyter@xxxxxxxxx>,
> "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Mp3, Attendance & AC Chat from SCI
> call 02 June 2016
>
> I see Michelle sent out both the calendar invite and email invite for the
> next call taking place on 16 June at 18:00 UTC.
>
> Do you see the emails? One would have been from Michelle, the other from the
> policy calendar.
>
> Make sure to check your spam folders.
>
> Let me know.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Terri
>
>
> From: owner-gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Sara Bockey
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:41 PM
> To: Lori Schulman <lschulman@xxxxxxxx>; Michelle DeSmyter
> <michelle.desmyter@xxxxxxxxx>; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx; Sara Bockey <sbockey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [gnso-secs] Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Mp3, Attendance & AC
> Chat from SCI call 02 June 2016
>
> I’ve had a similar issue. While I didn’t receive a calendar invite I had
> entered today’s meeting manually to my calendar during our last meeting 2 wks
> ago. Yesterday I added the AdobeConnect link (the entry was still there),
> but this morning it was gone. This is the second time this has happened but
> it’s only been with SCI for me. So strange!
>
> Sara
>
> From: <owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>> on behalf of Lori Schulman
> <lschulman@xxxxxxxx <mailto:lschulman@xxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 1:22 PM
> To: Michelle DeSmyter <michelle.desmyter@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:michelle.desmyter@xxxxxxxxx>>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Cc: "gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>" <gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Mp3, Attendance & AC Chat from SCI call
> 02 June 2016
>
> My apologies for today’s meeting. Once again, the call was dropped from my
> calendar. This seems to be an ongoing issue with ICANN invites not just for
> SCI but for other groups as well. I will work with my IT department to see
> if the problem is on our end.
>
> Lori S. Schulman
> Senior Director, Internet Policy
> International Trademark Association (INTA)
> +1-202-704-0408, Skype: lsschulman
>
> From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>]On Behalf Of Michelle DeSmyter
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:47 PM
> To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Mp3, Attendance & AC Chat from SCI call 02
> June 2016
>
> Dear All,
> Please find the MP3 recording of the Standing Committee on Improvements
> Implementation meeting held on Thursday, 02 June 2016:
> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-02jun16-en.mp3
> <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-02jun16-en.mp3>
> <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-02jun16-en.mp3>
>
> On page:http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#june
> <x-msg://1/:http:/gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#june>
>
> (transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page)
>
> Attendees:
> Anne Aikman-Scalese – IPC – Primary – Vice Chair
> Rudi Vansnick – NPOC –Primary –Chair
> Sara Bockey – RrSG – Primary
> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben – ISPCP – Primary
> Angie Graves – BC – Primary
> Renata Aquino-Ribeiro – NCUC - Alternate
>
> Apologies:
> Amr Elsadr – NCUC – Primary
> Lawrence Olawale-Roberts – BC - Alternate
>
> ICANN Staff:
> Mary Wong
> Julie Hedlund
> Glen de Saint Gery
> Michelle DeSmyter
>
>
> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
> Let me know if you have any questions.
> Thank you.
> Kind regards,
> Michelle DeSmyter
>
> Adobe Chat Transcript 02 June 2016
> Michelle DeSmyter:Dear All, Welcome to the Standing Committee on
> Improvements Implementation call on Thursday, 02 June 2016 at 18:00 UTC.
> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Hi all
> Sara Bockey:hello
> Rudi Vansnick:welcome Wolf-Ulrich, Sara
> Rudi Vansnick:waiting for the other members
> Rudi Vansnick:we have apologies from Amr
> Rudi Vansnick:welcome Angie, Anne
> Angie Graves:Thank you. Dialing in now
> Angie Graves:My apologies for my delay
> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:now I understand the point...
> Anne Aikman-Scalese:I don't have a strong opinion either way - just would
> like to know what our draft language actually means in this regard.
> Anne Aikman-Scalese:We should add after "on an interim basis" the following
> (i.e. during the 14 days)
> Sara Bockey:I agree with Anne on #4...I think we should be explicit in what
> is meant and currently some could view this as a grey area
> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:+1
> Mary Wong:Shall we just insert "within the allotted time period" in 4,
> after "interim basis"? ie remove from 2 & 3 as noted, but iinsert in 4 for
> clarity?
> Anne Aikman-Scalese:@ Mary - that would certainly also work for me - for
> clarity
> Rudi Vansnick:good proposal Mary ... let's get agreement on this ...
> Anne Aikman-Scalese:FYI that was my original proposal - put in 4 the
> language you are taking out of the last sentence of 3.
> Mary Wong:@Anne, so it was!
> Anne Aikman-Scalese:I think we can still send out for consensus call with
> changes in language made today.
> Mary Wong:Two weeks from today will be 16 June, so Amr can provide a
> written update to the Council at that time, before people start traveling to
> Helsinki.
> Anne Aikman-Scalese:@Mary - sounds good!
> Anne Aikman-Scalese:When does GNSO meet in Helsinki? is there a weekend
> meeting before or no such meeting? (Not as to SCI - just a question.)
> Julie Hedlund:@Anne: The GNSO Council meeting is on Thursday, and a short
> meeting on Monday for preparation, and no weekend session.
> Anne Aikman-Scalese:Thank you Julie. I have Accountability on Sunday so
> was just checking.
> Michelle DeSmyter:Welcome Renata!
> renata aquino ribeiro:apologies for joining so late. connection issue.
> Julie Hedlund:Thanks so much everyone!
> renata aquino ribeiro:Planning for Hyderabad?
> Julie Hedlund:Drinks sound good :-)
> Anne Aikman-Scalese:Thanks everyone. Goodbye - hope we can all have a
> drink together in Helsinki!
> renata aquino ribeiro:ok thanks
> Sara Bockey:Thank you all!
> Mary Wong:Thanks all!
> Anne Aikman-Scalese:Thank you Rudi.
> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Thanks Rudi, Anne and all. See you in Helsinki
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|