Re: [NA-Discuss] The problem with ALAC Statements
- To: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, NA Discuss <na-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, aheineman@xxxxxxxxxxxx, gnso-improvements-report-2008@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] The problem with ALAC Statements
- From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:23:54 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
Danny and all,
Concisely correct, and I agree. Further still the Atlarge
and the ALAC should be either seceded or completely
reconsitituted in a manner that reflects users regardless
>From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Apr 25, 2008 6:48 AM
>To: NA Discuss <na-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [NA-Discuss] The problem with ALAC Statements
>Let's talk about how the ALAC generates a "Statement"
>and what our NA reps on the ALAC can do to fix this
>We saw an abuse of process in the ALAC Statement on
>the JPA which was put forward without an ALAC vote
>(for that matter, it was put forward even without
>ALAC-member consensus: "Whilst this document is not
>tendered to you as formally constituted consensus of
>the views of all of the At-Large community on this
>We recently have witnessed the ALAC "Joint Statement"
>that once again was not subject to a vote of the ALAC
>nor was it a product of any wide-reaching discussions.
>Further, almost all recent ALAC documents have had a
>public comment period of extremely limited duration:
>The (non-joint) ALAC Statement on GNSO Improvements
>had a one week window for comments; the Statement on
>the Draft Operating Plan as well as the Statement on
>Travel Policy had a 10-day window for comment.
>Frankly, this sucks. Even ICANN routinely allows 3-4
>weeks for comments.
>I see the same types of things going on in the NCUC
>where members are given one or two days maximum to
>elicit organizational feedback in response to a
>position "already" taken by the leadership.
>More and more, we are witnessing the emergence of
>private fiefdoms wherein just one or two people within
>a constituent group call the shots and generate the
>Statements without any truly broad consultation. We
>don't need this kind of pattern to take hold in the
>It's time for our reps to take a principled stand on
>this issue and to insist on proper methodologies;
>otherwise, the NARALO should formally consider
>seceding from the ALAC.
>Be a better friend, newshound, and
>know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
>NA-Discuss mailing list
>Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
My Phone: 214-244-4827