<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: RCRC views regarding protection at the second level
- To: "Hughes, Debra Y." <Debra.Hughes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: RCRC views regarding protection at the second level
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:49:41 +0000
Thanks Debbie. This is very helpful to me.
I have concerns though about the following in the next to last paragraph: "Any
registry receiving a request of registration of a second-level domain should
therefore have an automatic system by which the request for registration of any
denomination from the list or an imitation thereof should raise a red flag,
requiring the registry to check whether the user is legitimate." An automatic
system is possible if there is a list of names that are excluded. But when I
see words like "any denomination" or "an imitation thereof", I don't know how
that can be automated. Similarly, how could a similarity test be done?
Chuck
From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Hughes, Debra Y.
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 2:15 PM
To: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RCRC views regarding protection at the second level
Dear colleagues,
1. As a follow-up to Jeff's email, we would like to share our views in regards
to the use of Red Cross and Red Crescent denominations within second-level
names.
2. The 1949 Geneva Conventions are binding for virtually all States: 194 in
total. In addition to the Conventions themselves, the national legislation of
the States party to the Conventions make it a criminal offence to use the names
"red cross", "red crescent" and "red lion and sun" unless they are used by
legitimate users; the 2005 Third Additional Protocol also added a new name and
emblem, called the "red crystal". Virtually all States of the world are
therefore under the same legal regime of the Geneva Conventions, which
prohibits the use of these denominations, but also of their "imitations", to
use the terminology of the First Geneva Convention (Article 53).
Therefore, any use of these denominations (or an imitation of those) is illegal
and may result in criminal prosecution at national level, unless they are used
by any of the components of the International Red Cross or Red Crescent
Movement, including its international bodies (the International Committee of
the Red Cross or the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent
Societies) or any of the National Red Cross or Red Crescent Societies. There
are very few exceptions in which under a national context a "non-Red Cross
user" can use the name, because of certain uses of the term that predated the
enactment of national legislation, such as "Red Cross salt" in the US, but none
of these exceptions applies internationally, and new exceptions are no longer
possible.
It is worth mentioning that this debate is not taking place in the context of
trademarks: as surprising as it may seem, the use of the denominations "red
cross", "red crescent", "red crystal" and "red lion and sun" are not merely
subject to trademark. As we noted above, the use of these denominations for the
Red Cross/Red Crescent is protected by criminal laws. Even in regards to the
above-mentioned exceptions, the use of the name "Red Cross" would not result in
the payment of royalties to the Red Cross by these grandfathered users. The
interests at stake relate to the protection of war victims and our humanitarian
mission-related activities, not about commercial issues. This issue is not
about defending trademark rights, but ICANN's compliance with criminal laws in
the 194 States, including the US, for which the Geneva Conventions are binding.
3. In practice, the Red Cross/Red Crescent frequently face issues related to
the abuse of their name and identity in second-level domain names. For
instance, a couple of weeks ago, a scammer registered a domain name called
"recrosssociety" under an existing gTLD, and that site was used to divert
money. This required legal action to be started, in order to have the
second-level domain name removed or at least "emptied" from its contents by the
registry. The Red Cross/Red Crescent would prefer to use the monies that are
generously donated to assist the worldwide communities the Movement serves and
not have to reallocate resources to address fraud.
4. The 1949 Geneva Conventions do not distinguish between languages: although
the first version of the Applicant's Guidebook included a list of names in the
six UN official languages, to limit the prohibition to those languages does not
make sense: the prohibition must prevail, in a given country, for all languages
commonly used in that country. As a consequence, because domain names apply on
a transnational level, the prohibition must apply to all languages, as a rule.
Of course, we understand that, for practical purposes, the work of registries
could be tremendously facilitated by having a list of the above-mentioned
denominations in the languages which are the most frequently used on the
Internet (around one hundred languages would probably cover about 99% of the
world population). Any registry receiving a request of registration of a
second-level domain should therefore have an automatic system by which the
request for registration of any denomination from the list or an imitation
thereof should raise a red flag, requiring the registry to check whether the
user is legitimate. Failing this, the application should be refused in order to
ensure the respect of existing norms of international humanitarian law, and
ensure that the registry is also complying with national legislation.
We are actively working with our member Societies worldwide in order to know
which languages will be relevant for their respective context. As agreed, we
will do our utmost to produce such a list before the ICANN Board meeting in
Costa Rica.
Best regards,
Debra Hughes (American Red Cross)
Christophe Lanord (International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent
Societies)
Stéphane Hankins (International Committee of the Red Cross)
Debra Y. Hughes
Senior Counsel
American Red Cross
2025 E Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20006
202.303.5356 (p)
202.303.0143 (f)
Debra.Hughes@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[cid:image001.png@01CCCBC1.3E01E520][cid:image001.jpg@01CCF638.E8F3E040]
This electronic message transmission contains information from the Office of
General Counsel of the American Red Cross and may be confidential or
privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or
entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is
prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please
notify me immediately by telephone 202.303.5356 or by e-mail at
Debra.Hughes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and delete this e-mail message from your computer.
Thank you.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|