<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: [council] FW: IOC/RC Drafting Team Status Report
- To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: [council] FW: IOC/RC Drafting Team Status Report
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:30:25 +0000
Why not Stephane? I understand that requesting public comment at this point in
time would not follow standard procedure but this whole process has already
gone against standard procedure; that is why we are where we are. At the same
time, it is a critical part of GNSO principles to include public comments so
anything we can do to make that happen would ensure that we abide by our
principles as much as possible.
Chuck
From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 4:18 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
Cc: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: [council] FW: IOC/RC Drafting Team Status
Report
There is no official comment period planned for this. This is an unofficial
report drafted by Jeff to help with an upcoming call, and not a document of the
DT.
It should therefore not be put out for public comment.
Stéphane
Le 29 févr. 2012 à 21:34, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
Thanks Mary. The document is "out for public comment" now. I would love for
it to be formally out, but some may argue that takes an act of Council. We
have a very limited time frame here and have had valuable input from each
constituency and stakeholder group already and continue to get more.
Can ICANN staff put this on their page? Any help would be appreciated.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
From: Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 3:25 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Neuman, Jeff
Cc: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] FW: IOC/RC Drafting Team Status Report
Thanks, Jeff and everyone on the DT, for some marvelously quick and detailed
work, and for a very clear and concise report.
Question - will this be put out for "official" public comment? I ask partly
because of the possibility that the Council will be asked to vote on at least
some part of the report in Costa Rica, and also because the recommendations
pertain to protections that will also apply to future new gTLD rounds.
As many of you know, I definitely support a closer, better and more responsive
working relationship with the GAC; however, even leaving aside issues with the
process by which this particular issue came to the table and has now to be
resolved, I remain concerned about ad-hoc work under the heading of
"implementation" that isn't so much a natural follow-up to the GNSO's own
policy recommendations (i.e. in this case the 2007 report on new gTLDs) but
which could change or conflict with them. I know this issue was raised during
this particular DT's discussions, as was the issue of precedent-setting, so I'm
glad we're watchful for these risks. This might, however, buttress the argument
that at the very least, a public comment be instituted prior to any vote/action.
Cheers
Mary
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH
03301USAEmail: mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone>:
1-603-513-5143Webpage:http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected
writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
http://ssrn.com/author=437584
As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the
University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New Hampshire
School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed and now follow
the
convention:firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxx>.
For more information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law, please
visit law.unh.edu<http://law.unh.edu>
>>>
From:
"Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>>
To:
"council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx%20> "
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
CC:
"gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>"
<gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date:
2/28/2012 11:43 PM
Subject:
[council] FW: IOC/RC Drafting Team Status Report
FYI. Please circulate amongst your constituencies, stakeholder groups and
Advisory Committees.
From: Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 11:38 PM
To: Heather.Dryden@xxxxxxxx<mailto:Heather.Dryden@xxxxxxxx>;
mark.carvell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mark.carvell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
SRadell@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:SRadell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
Neuman, Jeff
Subject: IOC/RC Drafting Team Status Report
Heather, Mark and Suzanne,
As promised, please find enclosed a status report from the Chair of the IOC/RC
Drafting Team of the GNSO Council that has been tasked with advising the GNSO
Council with respect to the September 2011 GAC proposal on permanently
protecting the Olympic and Red Cross names at the top and second levels for new
gTLDs. Although this report was shared with the members of the Drafting Team,
it was drafted by me as the Chair, and as such is not an official report from
the Drafting Team. It represents the Chair's current understanding of the
discussions of the Drafting Team. Each of the recommendations addressed in
this report are still under review by the GNSO Community. We are providing
this report to assist in the discussions between the Drafting Team, interested
GNSO Councilors and GAC members on March 2, 2012.
Please feel free to forward this report to the other members of the GAC as I
will be sending this to the GNSO Council as well. We look forward to a
productive call this Friday as well as in Costa Rica at the ICANN meeting.
Best regards,
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 /
jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx> /
www.neustar.biz<http://www.neustar.biz/>
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|