ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-iocrc-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Draft Public Comment For Review- Final Version

  • To: "'Margie Milam'" <margie.milam@xxxxxxxxx>, "'gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx'" <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Draft Public Comment For Review- Final Version
  • From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 06:47:02 -0500

Just reread the last sentence....gotta love iPad's. It should say that the 
perception that neither the gnso council or "board" can act until the public 
comment period is over.

Sorry for the typo.



Sent with Good (www.good.com)


 -----Original Message-----
From:   Neuman, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent:   Monday, March 05, 2012 06:44 AM Eastern Standard Time
To:     'Margie Milam'; 'gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx'
Cc:     'Stéphane Van Gelder'
Subject:        RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Draft Public Comment For Review-  Final 
Version 


All,

 I just wanted everyone to know that despite the conversation on the list and 
the fact that i edited the 
comment period description to end the day before the Council meeting, ICANN 
staff decided to have the public comment period end March 23, and this new 
"reply period" to end on April 14th (2 days after the application window 
closes).  I wanted to bring this to everyone's attention because I fully expect 
Icann staff to defend their letter of the status quo for round 1 based solely 
on the fact that the public comment period ends after the window closes.  I am 
extremely disappointed In yet another attempt to circumvent our process and the 
work we are doing and would like to add this to the list of questions for Icann 
staff.  I also expect criticism from the community if we ask the gnso to act 
before the public comment period ends.  I have already have 2 reporters point 
this out to me and ask if that meant that the notion of changes were "killed".  
(I did not respond).

I would like to ask for those dates to be revised so as to not create confusion 
or the perception that neither the gnso council or the stafford can act before 
the comment period is up.



Sent with Good (www.good.com)


 -----Original Message-----
From:   Neuman, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent:   Friday, March 02, 2012 08:44 PM Eastern Standard Time
To:     'Margie Milam'; 'gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx'
Subject:        RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Draft Public Comment For Review-  Final 
Version 


Thanks Margie.  We really appreciate the quick turnaround,



Sent with Good (www.good.com)


 -----Original Message-----
From:   Margie Milam [mailto:Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent:   Friday, March 02, 2012 05:40 PM Eastern Standard Time
To:     gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject:        [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Draft Public Comment For Review-  Final 
Version 

Dear All,

 

I accepted Jeff’s revisions and caught a few typos.   The proposal is 
untouched, except to add a footnote with the date.   

 

Since there don’t appear to be any more comments,  this will be forwarded for 
posting.

 

Best regards,

 

Margie 

 

 

 

From: Neuman, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 1:32 PM
To: Margie Milam; gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Draft Public Comment For Review

 

Sorry for the delay, but this looks right to me.

 

Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs

 

________________________________

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.

 

 

From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Margie Milam
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 2:32 PM
To: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Draft Public Comment For Review
Importance: High

 

Dear All,

 

Attached for your review is the DT Proposal to be posted with the Public 
Comment announcement discussed in below.   I have also attached a redline 
indicating the changes from the Status Report.

 

Please let me know ASAP if you have any suggested changes or revisions to this 
document.

 

All the best,

 

Margie

 

 

From: Margie Milam 
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 12:03 PM
To: 'gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx'
Subject: Draft Public Comment For Review
Importance: High

 

Dear All,

 

As discussed on today’s call, please find attached for your review the 
announcement of the opening of a public comment on the proposed solution. I 
will circulate the proposal document separately.

 

Please provide any comments ASAP.  I  plan to forward to the web admin team, 
per the DT’s instructions, this afternoon, at 4:00pm PST.

 

All the best,

 

Margie







<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy