Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Languge Issue Solution

["J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>]

I can live with that.

------------------------------
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 11:10 AM PDT Neuman, Jeff wrote:

>Ok, so I am a little confused on the ask.  Would recommendation 2 now just 
>become something like:
>
>
>            The GAC has proposed that the IOC and RCRC "names should be 
> protected in multiple languages-all translations of the listed names in 
> languages used on the Internet...The lists of protected names that the IOC 
> and RC/RC have provided are illustrative and representative, not exhaustive." 
>  Although the Drafting Team agrees with the notion that the lists provided by 
> the IOC and RCRC were illustrative, protecting the terms in every language on 
> the Internet is not a standard that the Drafting Team believes is feasible to 
> achieve.  While it is true that the list of languages can be expanded at a 
> subsequent date, for this round, we recommend limiting the list of languages 
> to those already contained in the Applicant Guidebook.
>
>
>Jeffrey J. Neuman
>Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
>
>________________________________
>The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
>of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
>information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
>e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or 
>copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
>communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original 
>message.
>
>
>From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
>Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
>Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:55 AM
>To: Kiran Malancharuvil; gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>Cc: Jim Bikoff; debra.hughes@xxxxxxxxxxxx; shankins@xxxxxxxx; 
>christophe.lanord@xxxxxxxx
>Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Languge Issue Solution
>
>Thanks for this.  Can I ask that you please send this to the full drafting 
>team list so we can amend the motion?
>
>Jeffrey J. Neuman
>Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
>
>________________________________
>The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
>of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
>information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
>e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or 
>copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
>communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original 
>message.
>
>
>From: Kiran Malancharuvil [mailto:kmalancharuvil@xxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 4:12 PM
>To: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: Neuman, Jeff; Jim Bikoff; 
>debra.hughes@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:debra.hughes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
>shankins@xxxxxxxx<mailto:shankins@xxxxxxxx>; 
>christophe.lanord@xxxxxxxx<mailto:christophe.lanord@xxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Languge Issue Solution
>Importance: High
>
>Dear Jeff and all:
>
>The RCRC and IOC representatives met this afternoon as requested, to discuss 
>the languages to be included for the String Similarity Review on the top-level 
>and for the first round only.
>
>The RCRC and IOC have agreed to limit the languages submitted for String 
>Similarity Review on the top-level and for the first round to those set forth 
>in the Applicant Guidebook in Section 2.2.1.2.3.  The parties have decided to 
>proceed this way in the spirit of cooperation and for purposes of expediency, 
>understanding that the parties both assert that the list of languages as set 
>forth in the Applicant Guidebook in Section 2.2.1.2.3 is only illustrative and 
>the denominations have broader protections in other languages that may be 
>asserted in future rounds and at the second level.  We hope that this spirit 
>of cooperation will resolve the discussions that have been held on the 
>languages issue and will help move this proposal forward to consensus.
>
>Accordingly, as this list has been previously verified, we recommend that the 
>last sentence of Recommendation 2 relating to vetting of the list be deleted.
>
>Respectfully submitted,
>
>Christophe Lanord, Debra Hughes, Jim Bikoff, Kiran Malancharuvil and Stephane 
>Hankins
>
>
>
>Kiran J. Malancharuvil
>
>Silverberg, Goldman & Bikoff, L.L.P.
>
>Georgetown Place, Suite 120
>
>1101 30th Street NW
>
>Washington, DC 20016
>
>(202) 944-3307 - Office
>
>(619) 972-7810 - Mobile
>
>kmalancharuvil@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:kmalancharuvil@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>