RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Languge Issue Solution

["Shatan, Gregory S." <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think we have moved beyond this list and I generally support the
revised Proposal 2 as recently circulated.  Since the GAC suggested all
the languages on the Internet, I think we need to respond to that
proposal, one way or the other.  Failing to respond just leaves the GAC
hanging....  Proposal 2 resolves that.
 
Greg

________________________________

From: J. Scott Evans [mailto:jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 5:49 PM
To: Joy Liddicoat; Shatan, Gregory S.; 'Hughes, Debra Y.'; 'Neuman,
Jeff'; 'Kiran Malancharuvil'; gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Jim Bikoff'; shankins@xxxxxxxx; christophe.lanord@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Languge Issue Solution


I disagree.
 
j. scott evans - senior legal director,  head of global brand, domains &
copyright - Yahoo! Inc. - 408.349.1385 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx



________________________________

From: Joy Liddicoat <joy@xxxxxxx>
To: "'Shatan, Gregory S.'" <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "'Hughes, Debra Y.'"
<Debra.Hughes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "'Neuman, Jeff'" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>;
'Kiran Malancharuvil' <kmalancharuvil@xxxxxxxxx>;
gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
Cc: 'Jim Bikoff' <jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx>; shankins@xxxxxxxx;
christophe.lanord@xxxxxxxx 
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:22 PM
Subject: RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Languge Issue Solution


I actually think option 2 is a good idea, thanks Greg.
Joy
 
From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Shatan, Gregory S.
Sent: Wednesday, 14 March 2012 7:10 a.m.
To: Hughes, Debra Y.; Neuman, Jeff; Kiran Malancharuvil;
gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Jim Bikoff; shankins@xxxxxxxx; christophe.lanord@xxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Languge Issue Solution
 
Is the appropriate change:
 
1.  To remove the last sentence of Proposal 2
2.  To remove all of Proposal 2 (referring to as many languages as
feasible), or
3.  To edit Proposal 2 to support the utilization only of the languages
set forth in the AGB?
 
Leaving the rest of Proposal 2 doesn't seem to make sense to me, since
it is at odds with the proposed change below.  Thus, I would suggest the
amendment should be either 2 or 3 above.
 
Greg
 
Gregory S. Shatan 
Deputy Chair| Tech Transactions Group 
IP | Technology | Media 
ReedSmithLLP 
The business of relationships
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
212.549.0275 | Phone
917.816.6428 | Mobile
212.521.5450 | Fax
gshatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.reedsmith.com 
 
________________________________

From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hughes, Debra Y.
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:04 PM
To: 'Neuman, Jeff'; Kiran Malancharuvil; gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Jim Bikoff; shankins@xxxxxxxx; christophe.lanord@xxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Languge Issue Solution
Jeff,
The email was sent to the Drafting team email list (gnso-iocrc-dt.org).
Is there another list?
Debbie
 
 
Debra Y. Hughes 
Senior Counsel  
 
American Red Cross
2025 E Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20006
202.303.5356 (p)
202.303.0143 (f)
Debra.Hughes@xxxxxxxxxxxx
 
From: Neuman, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 1:55 PM
To: Kiran Malancharuvil; gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Jim Bikoff; Hughes, Debra Y.; shankins@xxxxxxxx;
christophe.lanord@xxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Languge Issue Solution
 
Thanks for this.  Can I ask that you please send this to the full
drafting team list so we can amend the motion?
 
Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
 
________________________________

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you
have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately and delete the original message.
 
 
From: Kiran Malancharuvil [mailto:kmalancharuvil@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 4:12 PM
To: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Neuman, Jeff; Jim Bikoff; debra.hughes@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
shankins@xxxxxxxx; christophe.lanord@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Languge Issue Solution
Importance: High
 
Dear Jeff and all:
                                                            
The RCRC and IOC representatives met this afternoon as requested, to
discuss the languages to be included for the String Similarity Review on
the top-level and for the first round only.  
 
The RCRC and IOC have agreed to limit the languages submitted for String
Similarity Review on the top-level and for the first round to those set
forth in the Applicant Guidebook in Section 2.2.1.2.3.  The parties have
decided to proceed this way in the spirit of cooperation and for
purposes of expediency, understanding that the parties both assert that
the list of languages as set forth in the Applicant Guidebook in Section
2.2.1.2.3 is only illustrative and the denominations have broader
protections in other languages that may be asserted in future rounds and
at the second level.  We hope that this spirit of cooperation will
resolve the discussions that have been held on the languages issue and
will help move this proposal forward to consensus. 
 
Accordingly, as this list has been previously verified, we recommend
that the last sentence of Recommendation 2 relating to vetting of the
list be deleted.  
 
Respectfully submitted,
 
Christophe Lanord, Debra Hughes, Jim Bikoff, Kiran Malancharuvil and
Stephane Hankins
 
 
Kiran J. Malancharuvil
Silverberg, Goldman & Bikoff, L.L.P.
Georgetown Place, Suite 120
1101 30th Street NW
Washington, DC 20016
(202) 944-3307 - Office
(619) 972-7810 - Mobile
kmalancharuvil@xxxxxxxxx
 
 
 
* * * 
 
This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered confidential and
may well be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you
are on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply
e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy
it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other
person. Thank you for your cooperation. 
* * * 
To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we inform you
that, unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax advice
contained in this communication  (including any attachments) is not
intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of
(1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable
state and local provisions or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending
to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein. 
Disclaimer Version RS.US.1.01.03
pdc1