ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Help with uploading IOC/RC comment

  • To: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Help with uploading IOC/RC comment
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 02:11:54 +0000

I want to compliment the  NCSG policy committee for a well written statement.
What I do not understand is why the statement makes no reference to the 
amendments to the motion that were discussed by the DT last week and were 
supposed to be discussed by the various SGs and constituencies.  Would those 
amendments satisfy the requests made in the statement?  If not, why not?  It 
would have been much more helpful if this was made clear in the statement 
before the Council meeting.
Also, I don't understand this claim in the statement: "It is not currently 
clear whether and to what extent the question of whether there is GAC consensus 
on the appropriate legal protections for these organizations vis-à-vis those 
being requested for the IOC and RC has been fully debated within the GAC, or 
will be."  It is my understanding that it was made clear in the joint GNSO/GAC 
meeting that the GAC request was a GAC consensus position; that is certainly 
what I heard.  Is that clarification from the GAC now in dispute?  Do we 
disbelieve the claim made by the GAC?
From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Margie Milam
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 8:33 PM
To: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] FW: Help with uploading IOC/RC comment

Dear All-
I am forwarding Mary's statement to the list since there seems to be some 
problem in the file.   I have sent to our technical group to correct, but 
wanted to make sure you had access to the NCSG statement in the interim.

From: Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 10:31 PM
To: Margie Milam
Subject: Help with uploading IOC/RC comment

Hi Margie, I'm so sorry to be a pest, but for some reason the document I tried 
to upload to the ICANN Public Comment Forum for the IOC/RC proposals doesn't 
display as a Word document after upload (instead, all I get when I try to open 
it off the Forum thread page is gibberish). If you don't mind, could I trouble 
you to correct my upload (I attach the original document here) or have someone 
at ICANN tech figure out what went wrong?

Thanks so much! I hope you had a nice time at the beach after the ICANN 
meeting, and look forward to seeing you again soon!



Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
03301USAEmail: mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone>: 
1-603-513-5143Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected 
writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: 
As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the 
University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New Hampshire 
School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed and now follow 
the convention: 
firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxx>. For more 
information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit 

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy