<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Summary Report on Public Comments Posted
- To: Brian Peck <brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Summary Report on Public Comments Posted
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 12:33:05 +0000
Thanks for alerting us to this Brian.
Unlike previous public comment summary reports, this doesn't appear to me to
contain any staff analysis. Was that intentional? If so, why?
I note that Section IV of the report is titled 'Analysis of Comments' but it is
really just a continuation of Section III, 'Summary of Comments' with quite a
bit of duplication from Section III.
Any clarification regarding staff's intent and/or rationale on this approach
would be appreciated.
Chuck
From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Brian Peck
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 2:59 PM
To: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Summary Report on Public Comments Posted
Wanted to advise the Drafting Team that the Summary Report on the Public
Comments for the Proposal to Protect International Red Cross and International
Olympic Committee Names at the Top Level in New gTLDs has now been posted on
the ICANN website:
http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/report-comments-ioc-rcrc-proposal-08may12-en.pdf
Best Regards,
Brian Peck
Policy Director
ICANN
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|