<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Red Cross/IOC: List of possible approaches to respond to GAC proposal
- To: Brian Peck <brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Red Cross/IOC: List of possible approaches to respond to GAC proposal
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:08:38 +0200
Hi,
Just read through this.
Perhaps I wrote my note hurriedly.
"with a little support for 3 and for 4."
Little support seems to have a wrong connotation. I meant 'some support'
when i said 'a little support.'
And yes, i should have used agreed up WG terminology, even if this isn't a WG.
Some support for 3, 4 and 5 would have been more accurate.
thanks
On 25 Jul 2012, at 21:58, Brian Peck wrote:
> <Red Cross & IOC Names - Possible Approaches.25.July.doc>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|