ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Final Document for Public Comment Period

  • To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx'" <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Final Document for Public Comment Period
  • From: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:33:21 -0700 (PDT)

Hey Jeff:

Before posting, could you all correct a typo in the IPC statement that appears 
twice in the document.  Specifically, in the penultimate line of the second 
paragraph an "s" needs to be deleted from the word "reservations" so that the 
last sentence reads as follows:

While we disagree with this position, we believe it is an acceptable compromise 
to accede to the recommendation for a PDP so long as there is a temporary 
reservation of the IOC/RC names on the second level pending the outcome of the 
recommended PDP. 


J. Scott

j. scott evans -  head of global brand, domains & copyright - Yahoo! Inc. - 
408.349.1385 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx

 From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx'" <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 1:56 PM
Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Final Document for Public Comment Period

This afternoon/evening, the recommendations document (attached) from the 
Drafting team will be posted for public comment period.  In addition, in the 
posting that has the document attached, you will find a “note from the Drafting 
Team Chair” that states:
Note from the IOC/RCRC Drafting Team Chair:
These recommendations are being posted at the request of the Drafting Team.  
Although some members of the Drafting Team believe that a PDP is not necessary 
at this time to grant second level protections for the IOC/RCRC, a consensus of 
the DT does in fact agree that a PDP represents an appropriate compromise on 
this issue.  With respect to Recommendations #2 and #3, there is strong support 
amongst the Drafting Team for those recommendations with opposition from the 
Non-commercial Stakeholder Group and Thomas Rickert.  A copy of statements from 
certain constituencies, stakeholder groups, and/or individuals is attached as 
appendices to this statement.
Below is the Schedule for Comments:
Comment Open:  28 September 2012
Comment Close:  19 October 2012
Reply Open:  20 October 2012
Reply Close:  9 November 2012
I understand that the comment period closes during the ICANN meeting, and I 
apologize for that, but there is a 21 day reply period as well.  I wanted to 
make sure that both of the comment periods close well in time for the 
mid-November GNSO Council meeting.
Thank you everyone for your hard work and there will be no calls or meetings of 
the Drafting team until after Toronto.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
46000 Center Oak Plaza, Sterling, VA 20166
Office:+1.571.434.5772  Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: 
+1.703.738.7965/jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx  /www.neustar.biz

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy