ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-iocrc-dt] Re: [council] Initiation of IGO/INGO Protection PDP

  • To: Brian Peck <brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Re: [council] Initiation of IGO/INGO Protection PDP
  • From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:20:20 -0400

My inclination is to disagree on the last point. Sub-group A is likely to be superset of the DT (perhaps a large one) and I think the original DT should do the analysis and comments of the PC input (along with any changes to the recommendations of needed).


At 26/10/2012 06:13 PM, Brian Peck wrote:

Because the IOC/RCRC DT members will likely participate in the IGO-INGO PDP, Staff suggests that the current IOC/RCRC DT be suspended. It is expected that the remaining IOC/RCRC DT efforts, after the close of the public comment period, will be addressed by sub-group A of the PDP WG mentioned above.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy