<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Proposed Motion for Discussion Today
- To: "gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Proposed Motion for Discussion Today
- From: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:09:52 -0800 (PST)
Jeff-
I agree.
j. scott evans - head of global brand, domains & copyright - Yahoo! Inc. -
408.349.1385 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx
________________________________
From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx"
<gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>; "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2012 7:45 AM
Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Proposed Motion for Discussion Today
Thanks Chuck. I assume you mean, that if there are not changes, we should not
go backwards…..I think you left out the not.
I want to also stress that the analysis of the public comments should not just
look at opposition, if there is opposition, but to look at whether the
arguments raised by the opposition were not previously raised within the
drafting team. Another way to think about it is whether there is any new
information presented by the comments that the Drafting Team did not have in
its consideration of its recommendations.
I look forward to talking to you all later.
Best regards,
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
From:Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 10:40 AM
To: Neuman, Jeff; gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Proposed Motion for Discussion Today
I definitely support putting the motion forward if, after we review and analyze
the public comments, those comments demonstrate strong opposition to our
recommendations or suggest significant changes.
Our task today should be to review and analyze the public comments and decide
whether any changes are in order; if not, we should go backwards and revisit
our decision.
Chuck
From:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 10:03 AM
To: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Proposed Motion for Discussion Today
All,
Assuming the Drafting Team has not changed its view on the recommendations
posted for public comment, I intend on sending in this motion to the Council by
the end of the day. Lets discuss on the call today. I know the reply period
ends in 2 days, but the motion needs to be filed today in order to be on the
GNSO Council agenda next week.
Thanks.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
46000 Center Oak Plaza, Sterling, VA 20166
Office:+1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax:
+1.703.738.7965/jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx /www.neustar.biz
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|