<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-irtp-b-jun09] GoDaddy holding domains "hostage" via so-called "opt-in" procedures?
- To: Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] GoDaddy holding domains "hostage" via so-called "opt-in" procedures?
- From: George Kirikos <icann@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:49:12 -0400
Hi folks,
I saw some interesting comments on Twitter from an ordinary user in
relation to GoDaddy's so-called "opt in" hold. It should perhaps serve
as a reminder why rules about transfers between registrars were
created originally:
http://twitter.com/wedschilde/status/16429902106
@godaddy FAIL. having to fight to transfer domain for
threecrowpress.com. giving 24 hours. ICANN complaint already filed.
#godaddyfail
http://twitter.com/wedschilde/status/16430649817
@Beshter @brk_nlssn i hate having to fight for something that's mine.
major #godaddy fail. sighs.
http://twitter.com/wedschilde/status/16430757083
@Hoshiko_Malfoy i need a tweetwar. godaddy (@godaddy) doesn't want to
release my domain name. i demand it release the hostage.
http://twitter.com/wedschilde/status/16430802773
@Beshter i've already filed an ICANN. they do this all the time. it's
commonplace. & in @godaddy math, 8.10.10 is 60 days from now.
http://twitter.com/wedschilde/status/16431350059
@brk_nlssn Holding threecrowpress.com hostage because for "internally"
opt-in security rules. i told them no. release it. bad @godaddy
I think this example goes directly to points (c) and (d) of the charter:
"c) Whether special provisions are needed for a change of registrant
when it occurs near the time of a change of registrar. The policy does
not currently deal with change of registrant, which often figures in
hijacking cases;
d) Whether standards or best practices should be implemented regarding
use of a Registrar Lock status (e.g. when it may/may not,
should/should not be applied);"
and in particular, whether some registrars use a creative
interpretation of "opt-in" to a process which registrants can't
opt-out of, except via a denial of service (which doesn't make it
"opt-in" at all).
What are the "costs" to the public vs. the benefits? These are real
costs in terms of inconveniencing real users.
Sincerely,
George Kirikos
416-588-0269
http://www.leap.com/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|