<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Response from ICANN Compliance re. impact of voluntarily language on 60 day lock
- To: "<rob.golding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" <rob.golding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Response from ICANN Compliance re. impact of voluntarily language on 60 day lock
- From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:19:38 +0000
On 16 Sep 2010, at 21:09, Rob Golding wrote:
>
>> clarify the distinction between a Whois update and a change of
>> registrant
>
> With regards to domain contacts - registrant, billing, technical, admin ...
>
> It was raised earlier on-list that the process of transferring a domain
> between registrars and that of changing the contact details for a domain,
> whilst commonly/logically (as far as domain user is concerned) done at the
> same time, are different processes and should be treated as such.
>
> For a "thick-whois" system like .org this is trivial - the contact
> information is stored at the registry and easily available to the new
> registrar, so the process (normally) would be to receive the domain, then to
> issue the appropriate instructions to change the contact details.
>
> However for a "thin-whois" system like .com this is not trivial or (with any
> level of real accuracy) automatable.
>
> Because the registry does not hold details of who the registrant is
> (arguably the most important piece of information after the domain name
> itself) the new registrar is (as far as I can tell) forced to attempt to
> "scrape" the details from a text dump of the public whois (when its
> working), with varying degrees of success.
And in "thin whois" you have to do the same with all the other contacts too ..
not just the registrant
>
> If IRTP and similar are concerned (as they should be) with hijacks, illegal
> transfers, unauthorised contact changes etc - should we be setting down some
> rules about contact-retrieval across all TLDs and a definition of *exactly*
> what a registrant is and what "powers" over the domain they should have - in
> some places they are treated as god, in others they're insignificant and
> "admin is king" ...
>
> Rob
>
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
ICANN Accredited Registrar
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://blacknight.mobi/
http://mneylon.tel
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
US: 213-233-1612
UK: 0844 484 9361
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|