<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Updated recommendations overview
- To: <Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Updated recommendations overview
- From: "Diaz, Paul" <pdiaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:54:50 -0500
I have a question/concern about Recommendation #3, in particular the sentence
that reads:
It should be noted that this recommendation does not imply that
additional information collected under a thick WHOIS model needs to be
publicly displayed.
What is this supposed to mean? Thick WHOIS Registry Operators display whatever
contact information registrars have collected and passed through (under the
terms of their Registry-Registrar Agreements). Do we really imagine any RO
parsing out Registrant email addresses so they don't publicly appear, but will
somehow made available to registrars for IRTP purposes? I think this is
unrealistic, and recommend dropping this sentence from Recommendation #3.
The focus of our Recommendation should be on setting the stage for an Issues
Report and/or PDP on thick WHOIS for all gTLD registries. Let that future WG
debate what data could or should be included in the publicly available WHOIS.
It's inappropriate/out of scope for the IRTP B WG to color the debate with its
opinion about whether all data should be presented.
Regards, P
________________________________________
From: owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 4:29 AM
To: Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Updated recommendations overview
Dear All,
Please find attached the updated recommendations overview which incorporates
the changes discussed at last week's meeting and suggestions posted on the
mailing list.
With best regards,
Marika
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|