RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Updated recommendations and action items

["James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Marika and Team:

My proposed language for Recommendation #4.  I believe it is closely
aligned with Simonetta's proposal, and hope she accepts this as a
friendly amendment.  Look forward to further discussions on tomorrow's
call.

Thank you,

J.

------------------------------
The WG notes that the primary function of IRTP is to permit Registered
Name Holders to move registrations to the Registrar of their choice,
with all contact information intact.  The WG also notes that IRTP is
widely used in the domain name aftermarket community to affect a "change
of control," moving the domain name to a new Registered Name Holder. 
Our discussions within the WG and with ICANN Staff have determined that
there is no defined "change of control" function.  Therefore, the IRTP-B
WG recommends the initiation of an Issues Report to examine this issue,
including an investigation of how this function is currently achieved,
if there are any applicable models in the country-code name space, and
any associated security concerns.  (Others?)
------------------------------





-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Updated recommendations and action items
From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, January 26, 2011 1:24 pm
To: "Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx>

   Dear All,


You'll find attached an updated version of the recommendations document
including notes and updates from yesterday's meeting. Please take note
of the following outstanding action items:

+ Recommendation #2 - Give further consideration to whether any specific
actions for the promotion of SAC 044 could / should be included (All).
FYI, following discussions with SSAC staff and email has been sent to
the SSAC leadership with a request for feedback.
+ Recommendation #4 -  James noted that he would like to propose a few
modifications to Simonetta’s language which he would share with the
list shortly (James)
 
+ Charter Question B -  Chris agreed to provide draft language for
inclusion in the notes of the report to highlight the different
scenarios explored in relation to this charter question (Chris)
+ Review Draft Final Report by 1 February 2011 (All)

As discussed, I'll be sending out in separate threats the different
recommendations that require further discussion / review and would like
to encourage you to share your feedback on the mailing list ahead of
next week's meeting.


Thanks,


Marika