[gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For review - Recommendation #5

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Recommendation #5: The WG does recognize that the current language of denial 
reason #6 is not clear and leaves room for interpretation especially in 
relation to the term‘voluntarily’ and recommends therefore that this language 
is expanded and clarified to tailor it more to explicitly address 
registrar-specific (i.e. non-EPP) locks in order to make it clear that the 
registrant must give somesort of informed opt-in express consent to having such 
a lock applied, and the registrant must be able to have the lock removed upon 
reasonable notice andauthentication. The WG recommends to modify denial reason 
#6 as follows:
Express objection to the transfer by the Transfer Contact. Objection could take 
the form of specific request (either by paper or electronic means) by the 
Transfer Contact to deny a particular transfer request, or a general objection 
to all transfer requests received by the Registrar, either temporarily or 
indefinitely. In all cases, the objection must be provided with the express and 
informed consent of the Transfer Contact on an opt-in basis and upon request by 
the Transfer Contact, the Registrar must remove the lock or provide a 
reasonably accessible method for the Transfer Contact to remove the lock within 
five (5) calendar days.

Notes: The WG agreed to propose a change to denial reason #6 as proposed by 
Barbara with the addition of ‘and upon request by the Transfer Contact, the 
Registrar must remove the lock orprovide a reasonably accessible method for the 
Transfer Contact to remove the lock within five (5) calendar days ‘.

=====================

Please share any comments, suggestions and/or proposed edits with the mailing 
list.

With best regards,

Marika