ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-irtp-b-jun09]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Feedback from Tim Cole

  • To: Michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "\"Neylon:\"@server.haven2.com":Blacknight <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Feedback from Tim Cole
  • From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 10:28:54 -0500

oooOOooo i like TEAC.  many fond memories of great tape-recorders.  :-)

On May 23, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:

> 
> 
> On 23 May 2011, at 12:21, Marika Konings wrote:
> 
>> Dear All,
>> 
>> As discussed during our last meeting, I received additional feedback from 
>> Tim concerning his conversation with James regarding the EAC. He pointed out 
>> the following issues:
>>      • Title – the WG might want to consider replacing the term 'EAC' with 
>> something more explicit and limited in scope to make sure it is not the 
>> subject of abuse or "mission creep". If this is specifically intended to 
>> address urgent transfer matters, then the term "Transfer" clearly needs to 
>> be in the name.
> 
> So maybe TEAC? "Transfer Emergency Action Channel" ?
> 
> 
>>      • RADAR - with sufficient resources dedicated to software development, 
>> it would not be that difficult to convert or add a current contact field in 
>> RADAR (e.g., the Transfer Contact) to the "Emergency Transfer Contact" or 
>> something similar, whose contact information is limited to others in the 
>> same category.  In other words, an Emergency Transfer Contact at one 
>> registrar could reach out to an Emergency Transfer Contact at another 
>> registrar. Where the new element arises is that the communication between 
>> the two parties would be coordinated through ICANN, with timestamps (e.g., 
>> UTC) all tracked through ICANN's system (at least for the initial response - 
>> which is governed by the turnaround rules – after that, resolution of any 
>> problem could be taken offline and handled through routine channels). This 
>> takes care of the response time tracking issue and protects the contacts 
>> from abusive use by non–eligible parties. It is relatively straightforward 
>> and our IT folks have deemed i!
> t feasible to develop. The WG has referred to this as a "phase two" proposal.
> 
> That's good to know
> 
> 
>> With best regards,
>> 
>> Marika
> 
> Mr Michele Neylon
> Blacknight Solutions
> Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
> ICANN Accredited Registrar
> http://www.blacknight.com/
> http://blog.blacknight.com/
> http://invadeeurope.eu/
> http://www.gettingbusinessonline.ie/
> http://rss.me/
> http://mneylon.tel
> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
> US: 213-233-1612 
> UK: 0844 484 9361
> Locall: 1850 929 929
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
> 
> PS: Check out our latest offers on domains & hosting: http://domainoffers.me/
> -------------------------------
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy