<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Feedback from Tim Cole
- To: Michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "\"Neylon:\"@server.haven2.com":Blacknight <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Feedback from Tim Cole
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 10:28:54 -0500
oooOOooo i like TEAC. many fond memories of great tape-recorders. :-)
On May 23, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:
>
>
> On 23 May 2011, at 12:21, Marika Konings wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> As discussed during our last meeting, I received additional feedback from
>> Tim concerning his conversation with James regarding the EAC. He pointed out
>> the following issues:
>> • Title – the WG might want to consider replacing the term 'EAC' with
>> something more explicit and limited in scope to make sure it is not the
>> subject of abuse or "mission creep". If this is specifically intended to
>> address urgent transfer matters, then the term "Transfer" clearly needs to
>> be in the name.
>
> So maybe TEAC? "Transfer Emergency Action Channel" ?
>
>
>> • RADAR - with sufficient resources dedicated to software development,
>> it would not be that difficult to convert or add a current contact field in
>> RADAR (e.g., the Transfer Contact) to the "Emergency Transfer Contact" or
>> something similar, whose contact information is limited to others in the
>> same category. In other words, an Emergency Transfer Contact at one
>> registrar could reach out to an Emergency Transfer Contact at another
>> registrar. Where the new element arises is that the communication between
>> the two parties would be coordinated through ICANN, with timestamps (e.g.,
>> UTC) all tracked through ICANN's system (at least for the initial response -
>> which is governed by the turnaround rules – after that, resolution of any
>> problem could be taken offline and handled through routine channels). This
>> takes care of the response time tracking issue and protects the contacts
>> from abusive use by non–eligible parties. It is relatively straightforward
>> and our IT folks have deemed i!
> t feasible to develop. The WG has referred to this as a "phase two" proposal.
>
> That's good to know
>
>
>> With best regards,
>>
>> Marika
>
> Mr Michele Neylon
> Blacknight Solutions
> Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
> ICANN Accredited Registrar
> http://www.blacknight.com/
> http://blog.blacknight.com/
> http://invadeeurope.eu/
> http://www.gettingbusinessonline.ie/
> http://rss.me/
> http://mneylon.tel
> Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
> US: 213-233-1612
> UK: 0844 484 9361
> Locall: 1850 929 929
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
>
> PS: Check out our latest offers on domains & hosting: http://domainoffers.me/
> -------------------------------
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845
>
>
>
>
>
>
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
web http://www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|