RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For FINAL review - IRTP Part B Final Report - deadline 29 May 2011

["Diaz, Paul" <pdiaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This looks good.  Please move the "or" to now follow "Order of a court
having jurisdiction over the transfer;"

 

Regards, P

 

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steele, Barbara
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 11:43 AM
To: Marika Konings; Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For FINAL review - IRTP Part B Final
Report - deadline 29 May 2011

 

Thanks Marika.

Below is the modification to the existing IRTP policy language that I
agreed to draft relating to registry responsibilities.  My goal was to
minimize the changes needed.  I also included the proposed modification
to this section that is proposed by the TEAC. Any and all feedback is
welcome.  Many thanks.

The Registry Operator shall undo a transfer if, after a transfer has
occurred, the Registry Operator receives one of the notices as set forth
below. In such case, the transfer will be reversed and the Registrar of
Record field domain name reset to its original state. The Registry
Operator must undo the transfer within five (5) calendar days of receipt
of the notice except in the case of a Registry dispute decision, in
which case the Registry Operator must undo the transfer within fourteen
calendar days unless a court action is filed. The notice required shall
be one of the following:

Agreement of the Registrar of Record and the Gaining Registrar sent by
email, letter or fax that the transfer was made by mistake or was
otherwise not in accordance with the procedures set forth in this
policy;

The final determination of a dispute resolution body having jurisdiction
over the transfer; or

Order of a court having jurisdiction over the transfer.

Documentation provided by the Registrar of Record prior to transfer that
the Gaining Registrar has not responded to a message via the TEAC within
the timeframe specified in Section 4.

 

 

 

Barbara Steele
Director of Policy
VerisignInc.com <http://www.verisigninc.com/>  

 

 

 

From: owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 5:46 AM
To: Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For FINAL review - IRTP Part B Final Report
- deadline 29 May 2011
Importance: High

 

Dear All,

 

You'll find posted on the wiki (
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtpb/For+Review+by+29+May+2011)
the latest version of the Final Report. This version includes the
changes discussed on our call yesterday (including amongst others:
changing Emergency Action Channel to Transfer Emergency Action Contact;
updated notes to reflect WG discussion and conclusion on 60-day lock
recommendation; updated TEAC FAQ).

 

This version does not include updated language to reflect that the
60-day lock should be considered as part of the Issue Report on 'change
of control' (recommendation #4) as discussed yesterday, which will be
circulated later today on the mailing list for your review and comment
by James / Simonetta. In addition, it does not include any language
Barbara may submit to convey that in the case of a transfer undo
registries will update the registrar of record to its previous state.

 

Apart from the updated recommendation in relation to the 60-day lock
which you will have the opportunity to review separately, the report
notes that all the recommendations listed currently in the report have
the full consensus support from the Working Group.

 

Please review the latest version of the Final Report. You are encouraged
to share any comments/edits/suggestions you may have as soon as possible
but no later than COB 29 May 2011. The objective is to submit this
report to the GNSO Council and for publication on Monday 30 May 2011.

 

With best regards,

 

Marika