RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] [FWD: [council] Call for Volunteers: Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group Members - Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part C]

["Sedo :: Simonetta Batteiger" <simonetta@xxxxxxxx>]

Also happy to keep working with the IRTP group.
Simonetta

From: owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 2:59 PM
To: Steele, Barbara; Tim Ruiz; GNSO-IRTP-B-JUN09@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] [FWD: [council] Call for Volunteers: Policy 
Development Process (PDP) Working Group Members - Inter-Registrar Transfer 
Policy (IRTP) Part C]

Thanks so much Barbara, noted and the info will be with you shortly.

Glen

From: Steele, Barbara [mailto:BSteele@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: mercredi 5 octobre 2011 14:15
To: Tim Ruiz; GNSO-IRTP-B-JUN09@xxxxxxxxx; Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] [FWD: [council] Call for Volunteers: Policy 
Development Process (PDP) Working Group Members - Inter-Registrar Transfer 
Policy (IRTP) Part C]

I am happy to continue to represent the RySG as a member of the working group 
for IRTP PDP Part C.




Barbara Steele
Director of Policy
bsteele@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:pbolanos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

t: 703-948-3343    m: 703-622-1071
21355 Ridgetop Circle, Dulles, VA 20166

VerisignInc.com<http://www.verisigninc.com/>

[cid:image002.gif@01CC8374.0D7A8500]



From: owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 4:36 PM
To: GNSO-IRTP-B-JUN09@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] [FWD: [council] Call for Volunteers: Policy 
Development Process (PDP) Working Group Members - Inter-Registrar Transfer 
Policy (IRTP) Part C]

FYI below. Hope we will see at least some of this group volunteer.

Best,
Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [council] Call for Volunteers: Policy Development Process
> (PDP) Working Group Members - Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP)
> Part C
> From: Glen de Saint G�©ry<Glen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Sun, October 02, 2011 5:15 am
> To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" 
> <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>
>
> Call for Volunteers: Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group Members - 
> Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part CÂ
> In BriefThe Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council seeks 
> volunteers to serve on a Working Group that will address issues related to 
> the transfer of domain names between registrars. After investigating and 
> considering specific issues (detailed below), the Working Group is expected 
> to recommend how to handle these issues, which could include proposals for 
> changes to the existing Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (a consensus policy 
> adopted in 2004).
> What This Group Will DoThe initial tasks of the group will be to consider the 
> following questions[1] and make recommendations to the GNSO Council:
>
>
> a)Â Â Â Â Â  "Change of Control" function, including an investigation of how 
> this function is currently achieved, if there are any applicable models in 
> the country-code name space that can be used as a best practice for the gTLD 
> space, and any associated security concerns. It should also include a review 
> of locking procedures, as described in Reasons for Denial #8 and #9, with an 
> aim to balance legitimate transfer activity and security.
> b)Â Â Â Â Â  Whether provisions on time-limiting Form Of Authorization (FOA)s 
> should be implemented to avoid fraudulent transfers out. For example, if a 
> Gaining Registrar sends and receives an FOA back from a transfer contact, but 
> the name is locked, the registrar may hold the FOA pending adjustment to the 
> domain name status, during which time the registrant or other registration 
> information may have changed.
> c)Â Â Â Â Â Â  Whether the process could be streamlined by a requirement that 
> registries use IANA IDs for registrars rather than proprietary IDs.
> How This Group Will WorkICANN Working Groups use transparent, open processes. 
> The meetings of this WG will be recorded, and the recordings will be 
> available to the public. The mailing list for the IRTP Part C WG will be 
> archived publicly. Working Group members are expected to submit Statements of 
> Interest (SOI). The group will collaborate using a public workspace. The 
> Working Group is expected to follow the GNSO Working Group Guidelines.
> How to JoinThe Council invites interested parties to provide names of 
> expected participants who can then be added to the WG mailing list. The GNSO 
> Council may also invite stakeholders and experts to join. Participants in the 
> Working Group that addressed IRTP Part B are especially encouraged to apply. 
> Community members who wish to be invited to join the group should contact the 
> GNSO secretariat 
> (gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxx>). This WG is 
> already forming; please apply promptly.
> Â
> BackgroundThe Inter©\Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) is a consensus policy 
> adopted in 2004 to provide a straightforward procedure for domain name 
> holders to transfer domain names between registrars. An overall review of 
> this policy identified areas that require clarification or improvement. At 
> its meeting of 22 September 2011, the Generic Names Supporting Organization 
> (GNSO) Council passed a resolution chartering a Policy Development Process 
> (PDP) Working Group (WG) to address the topic of Inter-Registrar Transfer 
> Policies (IRTP) Part C. Because the initial review identified a wide range of 
> issues related to transferring domain names, the issues have been categorized 
> into subsets. This Working Group will tackle the issues referred to as 
> ¡°Part C¡±.
> Â
> Sent on behalf of the GNSO Chair, St¨¦phane van Gelder
> Â
> Â
> Â
> Glen de Saint G¨¦ry
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> http://gnso.icann.org
> Â
> Â
>
> [1] See the Final Issue Report on the IRTP Part C for further details on each 
> of these issues.
>
>
>