ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08] FW: IRTP PDP A WG

  • To: "Glen_de_Saint_Géry" <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08] FW: IRTP PDP A WG
  • From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:56:48 -0700
<html><body><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><font size="2"><span 
style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><span 
style="font-family: verdana,geneva;">Not a comment on the proposed schedule 
revision, but in the interests of expediency I recommend we use this week to 
hash out some of the different positions and text construction of Question III 
here, on the mailing list.&nbsp; <br><br>Reason:&nbsp; This area seems to 
consume a disproportionate share of call-time when compared to questions I and 
II.<br><br>J.<br></span></span><br><br><br></span></font></span><blockquote 
webmail="1" style="border-left: 2px solid blue; margin-left: 8px; padding-left: 
8px;"><br>
<br>
<br>
Hello everyone,<br>
<br>
While today's call was productive, I had hoped that we would wrap up our 
discussion of the input template.  We also didn't get to the proposed timeline 
or the public comment solicitation statement.  These will be our priorities for 
the next call on September 2.<br>
<br>
Since the WG has been asked to consider the current drafts on the wiki, can one 
of you please revise the timeline to reflect our delay?  I recommend:<br>
<br>
Public comment period = 9/3 - 9/22<br>
Constituency Statement to Staff Manager = 10/3<br>
Initial report complete = 10/17<br>
Final review of Initial Report by WG = 10/28<br>
Public Comment Period = 10/29 - 12/9 (I suggest ample time to account for Cairo 
and the Thanksgiving holiday.  Also, some Constituencies' Bylaws require a 
number of days to respond)<br>
Final Report Complete &amp; Submitted to GNSO Chair = 12/19<br>
<br>
I throw these dates out to start a debate.  Some may think they include too 
much time, others may argue that this is not enough.  Unless we hit an impasse, 
we still should wrap this PDP A WG up before the end of the year.<br>
<br>
Regards, P<br>
<br>

</blockquote></body></html>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>