<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08] Draft concluding statements for each issue for review
- To: "Gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08] Draft concluding statements for each issue for review
- From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 01:01:21 -0800
Dear All,
As discussed on our last call, please find below for your review draft
concluding statements for each issue. Please note that these are merely
intended to start an online discussion that we will continue on next week's
call (9 December). All comments are welcome and encouraged.
With best regards,
Marika
============
Issue I
Based on the discussions in the Working Group, there appears to be agreement
that a policy change is not required. Some members suggested this issue could
be addressed as part of an overall technical modernization of the WHOIS
protocol, perhaps through updates. There appears to be a slight preference to
explore EPP and or future adoption of the IRIS protocol in further detail as a
possible solution over the other options discussed for Issue I. Neither of
these options received broad agreement, however. However, it should be noted
that the Working Group will not take a final decision on which solution(s), if
any, to recommendations to the GNSO Council before a thorough review of the
comments received during the public comment period and final constituency
statements has taken place.
Issue II
Based on the discussion in the Working Group, there appears to be broad some
agreement that there is a need for other options for electronic authentication.
However, opinions in the Working Group differ as to whether this should be an
issue for GNSO policy making or for market solutions. It should be noted that
the Working Group will not take a final decision on which solution(s), if any,
to recommendations to the GNSO Council before a thorough review of the comments
received during the public comment period and final constituency statements has
taken place.
Issue III
Based on the discussion in the Working Group, there appears to be broad
agreement that there is no need to incorporate provisions for handling partial
bulk transfers between registrars at this stage. The Working Group believes
that these scenarios can be addressed either through the existing Bulk Transfer
provisions, or through existing market solutions. It should be noted that the
Working Group will not take a final decision on which solution(s), if any, to
recommendations to the GNSO Council before a thorough review of the comments
received during the public comment period and final constituency statements has
taken place.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|