[gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08] Feedback from legal counsel and updated motion
Dear All, Following our call yesterday, I consulted with ICANN Legal Counsel and on the basis of that we would recommend the following: 1. There is no need to include any reference to ICANN Legal Counsel in the motion as no formal advice was provided. 2. Change the current language of the 3rd resolve to read: 'Recommends that ICANN staff communicate to registries and registrars that the current bulk transfer provisions do apply to cases requiring the transfer of all names in one single gTLD under management of a registrar.' Following the adoption of the motion, ICANN staff would then issue an advisory to this effect. For the sake of clarity, I have also included a reference to the current bulk transfer provisions to ensure that it is clear to which situations the bulk transfer provisions apply. You will find the updated motion attached. Please share your comments / suggestions with the mailing list. The updated draft final report will be posted shortly for review. With best regards, Marika Attachment:
Draft motion - IRTP Part A - Updated 18 March 2009.doc
|