RE: [gnso-irtpc] Additional Question Relating to Issue C of IRTP PDP Part C

["Steele, Barbara" <BSteele@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am fine with this approach.



Barbara Steele
Director of Policy


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:35 AM
To: rob.golding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-irtpc] Additional Question Relating to Issue C of IRTP PDP 
Part C


Good point, I think this is best answered by Registries. Although
Registrars are free to respond with any operational / technical problems
or challenges this creates.

Thanks--

J.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [gnso-irtpc] Additional Question Relating to Issue C of
IRTP PDP Part C
From: "Rob Golding" <rob.golding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, November 23, 2011 8:16 am
To: <gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx>


> Relating to Question C, registrars are asked to provide specific
> information as to where proprietary IDs are currently being used by
> registries that the use of IANA IDs instead would be preferred /
> beneficial

Isn't that a question to put to the *registry* rather than *registrar* ?
That way it's asked and documented Five times, not N thousand times.

FYI: all the "Affilias" run TLDs use proprietory identifiers

Rob