<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-irtpc] For review - Draft Initial Report
- To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpc] For review - Draft Initial Report
- From: Angie Graves <angie12345@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:33:14 -0400
Hi Marika,
Reviewing the document, I found some apparent typos and have listed them
below, along with suggestions for replacement text.
, if denial reason #9 would be applied
suggest changing to: were applied
---------------------------------------------------
which was update on a regular basis
suggest changing to: which was updated on a regular basis
---------------------------------------------------
Following review of the IRTP Part C Final Issue Report and the use cases,
the WG concluded that currently that currently there does not exist a
policy in relation to “change of control” or “change of registrant”, even
though such a process is implied, for example in the Uniform Dispute
Resolution Policy .
suggested changes:
* remove the second “currently there”
* punctuation for “change of registrant,” -- comma goes inside the
quotation marks
* add a comma after “for example”
---------------------------------------------------
the WG did take into account hat
suggest changing to: the WG did take into account that
---------------------------------------------------
it should neither prevent innovation and differentiation amongst registrars.
Comment: The wording is not clear to me.
---------------------------------------------------
Committees, and; comments
suggest changing to: Committees; and comments
---------------------------------------------------
community submissions
suggest changing to: community submission
---------------------------------------------------
There where
suggest changing to: Where
---------------------------------------------------
ccTLD level easier
suggest changing to: ccTLD level is easier
---------------------------------------------------
various jurisdictions
suggest changing to: multiple jurisdictions
---------------------------------------------------
new holder I s an individual
suggest changing to: new holder is an individual
---------------------------------------------------
process, before
suggest changing to: process; before,
---------------------------------------------------
Thank you,
Angie
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> You'll find attached and posted on the wiki (
> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtppdpwg/Next+Meeting) a first
> draft of the proposed Initial Report. Highlighted in yellow are those areas
> that need further completion / input from the WG (some of those will
> require the sub-teams to complete their tasks first). Please feel free to
> share any comments / edits you may have with the mailing list.
>
> With best regards,
>
> Marika
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|