<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: REMINDER FW: [gnso-irtpc] For Final Review - IRTP Part C Final Report
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "IRTPC Working Group" <gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: REMINDER FW: [gnso-irtpc] For Final Review - IRTP Part C Final Report
- From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 11:29:01 -0700
<html><body><span style="font-family:Arial; color:#000000;
font-size:10pt;"><div>Fair enough.</div><div><br></div><div>But acknowledging
that folks may have differing thresholds for "agreement" or
"support." For me, it might be
70-75%.</div><div><br></div><div>J.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>
<blockquote id="replyBlockquote" webmail="1" style="border-left: 2px solid
blue; margin-left: 8px; padding-left: 8px; font-size:10pt; color:black;
font-family:verdana;">
<div id="wmQuoteWrapper">
-------- Original Message --------<br>
Subject: Re: REMINDER FW: [gnso-irtpc] For Final Review - IRTP Part C<br>
Final Report<br>
From: Avri Doria <<a href="mailto:avri@xxxxxxx";>avri@xxxxxxx</a>><br>
Date: Fri, October 05, 2012 1:09 pm<br>
To: IRTPC Working Group <<a
href="mailto:gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx";>gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx</a>><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
> Of course, silence indicates that you support the existing consensus
recommendations.<br>
<br>
or at least that you do not object so much as to need to make a statement of
your own. in some cases other points of view are expressed in explanatory text
and people may have no further need to add comments, though they may not
support 100%.<br>
<br>
or something like that.<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 5 Oct 2012, at 10:29, James M. Bladel wrote:<br>
<br>
> Thanks, Marika.<br>
> <br>
> And just to reiterate our plan from Tuesday's call: If you intend to
submit a Minority Statement, you must tell us this (and where in the Report it
will be inserted) by EOD today, Friday October 5.<br>
> <br>
> The text of the statement itself must be posted to this list by our next
call, Tuesday Oct 9<br>
> <br>
> Of course, silence indicates that you support the existing consensus
recommendations.<br>
> <br>
> Thank you,<br>
> <br>
> J.<br>
> <br>
> -------- Original Message --------<br>
> Subject: REMINDER FW: [gnso-irtpc] For Final Review - IRTP Part C Final<br>
> Report<br>
> From: Marika Konings <<a
href="http://marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx";>marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx</a>><br>
> Date: Fri, October 05, 2012 8:09 am<br>
> To: "<a href="http://gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx";>gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx</a>"
<<a href="http://gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx";>gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx</a>><br>
> <br>
> REMINDER<br>
> <br>
> From: Marika Konings <<a
href="http://marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx";>marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx</a>><br>
> Date: Tuesday 2 October 2012 20:37<br>
> To: "<a href="http://gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx";>gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx</a>"
<<a href="http://gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx";>gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx</a>><br>
> Subject: [gnso-irtpc] For Final Review - IRTP Part C Final Report<br>
> <br>
> Dear All,<br>
> <br>
> Following today's meeting, please find attached for final review the IRTP
Part C Final Report. I've accepted all the changes of the previous version so
that in redline you will see the changes made based on today's discussion.
Please review this version carefully and share any comments / edits you may
have with the mailing list by Friday 5 October at the latest. The only item
that remains to be updated is the number of meetings attended by each WG member
which I'll finalise following next week's meeting.<br>
> <br>
> The WG Chairs plan to determine the level of consensus for the
recommendations as well as the report at the latest during next week's meeting
so if you have any objections and/or plan to submit a minority report, please
inform the mailing list accordingly by Friday 5 October at the latest.Minority
reports themselves should be received no later than Tuesday 9 October at 13.00
UTC. <br>
> <br>
> Thanks for all your hard work!<br>
> <br>
> Marika<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote></span></body></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|