<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-irtpc] Status of our Report and Draft Motion
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, IRTPC Working Group <gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpc] Status of our Report and Draft Motion
- From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:04:48 -0700
FYI, Stephane has requested the GNSO Council to waive the 8-day advance
submission deadline to be able to consider this motion in Toronto (see
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg13663.html).
With best regards,
Marika
On 11/10/12 23:28, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/GNSO+Council+Meeti
>ng+2012-10-17
>
>IRTP-C is motion 6
>
>avri
>
>
>
>On 11 Oct 2012, at 11:45, James M. Bladel wrote:
>
>> Hello IRTP-C Team. Or should I say "alumni?" :)
>>
>> Just an update on the status of our Final Report and the GNSO Council
>>Motion. Unfortunately, although _we_ made the document submission cut
>>off, this was not added to the GNSO Council agenda by the Toronto
>>deadline.
>>
>> HOWEVER----
>>
>> In possibly his last act as GNSO Chair, Mr. Stephane Van Gelder has
>>decided to exercise "chair prerogative" to get this on the Toronto
>>agenda.
>>
>> Stephane wanted me to relay this message to the IRTP-C members, along
>>with his personal thanks for all of our efforts. He knows we worked
>>hard to get this done by Toronto, and doesn't want our efforts to go
>>waste.
>>
>> Not sure if any of this has occurred yet, but this is the plan as I
>>understand it. Perhaps Marika can keep us appraised if there are any
>>further developments....
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> J.
>>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|