<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-irtpd] [registration-issues-wg] [ALAC] Registrants and the transfer process
- To: Holly Raiche <h.raiche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpd] [registration-issues-wg] [ALAC] Registrants and the transfer process
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 07:10:07 -0600
hi Holly,
probably the best bet for this person is Compliance. i wish i could find a URL
that summarized complaints by type, but i can’t. surely that have that data
however.
mikey
On Jan 5, 2014, at 10:17 PM, Holly Raiche <h.raiche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Everyone
>
> From out of the blue - someone who is interested in this subject from an
> academic perspective. I am happy to be the go-between if people are
> comfortable with that.
>
> Holly
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Sarah Alkire <skalkire@xxxxxx>
>> Date: 22 December 2013 3:54:48 PM AEDT
>> To: Holly Raiche <h.raiche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dharma Dailey
>> <dharma.dailey@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: RE: [registration-issues-wg] [ALAC] Registrants and the transfer
>> process
>>
>> Hi Holly,
>>
>> Thanks for the explanation. I am new to all of this, but am catching up. Do
>> you have any sense of what percentage (or what you think the percentage is)
>> of wrongful transfers versus other scenarios?
>>
>> I do have someone that complained of losing their domain on another list
>> (geared to women in IT) and wanted to complain to ICANN. The situation seems
>> to be due to a squatter, and a registrant that let it be purchased by 2
>> businesses. The person that lost was the owner of a small business. Would
>> you like me to connect you to her?
>>
>> At any rate, do you have a way for me to participate in gathering
>> information for your working group, or this issue?
>>
>> Sarah
>> From: Holly Raiche [h.raiche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2013 4:24 PM
>> To: Dharma Dailey
>> Cc: Sarah Alkire
>> Subject: Re: [registration-issues-wg] [ALAC] Registrants and the transfer
>> process
>>
>> Thanks Dharma and Hi Sarah
>>
>> Happy to have feedback on wrongful transfers. The Working Group I am in is
>> looking at the Inter-Registrar Transfer Process - in particular looking at
>> the variety of situations in which it occurs. The issue underlying it is to
>> understand when the transfer is wrongful in the sense that it has happened
>> contrary to provisions of ICANN policy and RAA requirements as against
>> situations when the transfer has occurred for other reasons (such as a web
>> designer not transferring control to the company for which the site as
>> designed, or a dispute within the organisation that haws the website)
>>
>> The ultimate purpose is to understand when ICANN might provide redress for
>> the registrant losing the name, and when the issue is outside of ICANN's
>> remit.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> HOlly
>>
>> On 21/12/2013, at 2:08 AM, Dharma Dailey wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Holly,
>>>
>>> I'd like to introduce you to Sarah Alkire who will be representing my ALS
>>> in London. She is new to At-Large and ICANN but I think she brings a lot
>>> to the table. She's in IT at the University of Washington and is pursuing
>>> her second masters in Human Centered Design and Engineering. She has the
>>> tech background to know how the Internet works and is well along in her
>>> training in user research. Sarah's interested in working on the wrongful
>>> transfer of registration that you posted about. If you can loop her in,
>>> that would be great.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Dharma
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 19, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Sarah Alkire wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Dharma,
>>>>
>>>> This is an issue that I’d really be interested in. Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Sarah
>>>>
>>>> From: registration-issues-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> [mailto:registration-issues-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Holly Raiche
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 10:32 PM
>>>> To: registration-issues-wg@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: [registration-issues-wg] Fwd: [ALAC] Registrants and the transfer
>>>> process
>>>>
>>>> Hi Everyone
>>>>
>>>> I sent this to the ALAC list, and Olivier suggested that I send it to this
>>>> list as well.
>>>>
>>>> Any and all input would be welcome
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> HOlly
>>>>
>>>> (I am sending this as a member of the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy D WG
>>>> (a GNSO WG)
>>>>
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Where the ITRP D working group is up to is gathering scenarios where the
>>>> registrant has lost their domain name.
>>>>
>>>> By way of background, in the earlier working group (IRTP C), the
>>>> possibility of the registrant being able to access the Inter-Registrar
>>>> Transfer Policy dispute mechanism. But for this working group, allowing
>>>> registrant access to the process is seen to be too hard. But the WG
>>>> agrees that there must be redress for registrants who have (wrongly) had
>>>> their domain name transferred away.
>>>>
>>>> Some of the scenarios are really not - at their base - an ICANN issue.
>>>> (the admin contact quits/is fired, and then cancels the name, takes it
>>>> with him/her, or the web designer gets the site up and running and then
>>>> doesn't give the name to the person who hired him/her.)
>>>>
>>>> But there are many scenarios that do amount to a breach of the RAA/policy.
>>>>
>>>> The WG's view at this stage is to have the registrant be able to go to
>>>> Compliance for enforcement of the transfer rules if the rules/policy has
>>>> not been followed.
>>>>
>>>> What Compliance has done for the group is forward the many situations
>>>> which will be considered as a breach of the RAA/policy and for which ICANN
>>>> should be able to order a transfer back of the name to the registrant.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have any real life scenarios that I can take to the group when
>>>> it reconvenes in January so that the WG can 'road test' how various
>>>> scenarios would be played out - i.e., in what circumstances the
>>>> registrant, with ICANN help, can recover a name transferred away from them
>>>> that should not, under ICANN rules, not have been transferred.
>>>>
>>>> Holly
>>>>
>>>> <ATT00001.c>
>>>
>>
>>
>
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP
(ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|