Re: [gnso-irtpd] IRTP Part D Final Report 2nd Draft

[Holly Raiche <h.raiche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Lars (and everyone)

Sorry I”ll be an apology for the next meeting.  The point I was making at the 
last meeting was with the first sentence.  We have considered allowing 
registrants into the dispute process as provided for in IRTP-C - and then 
rejected it.  What was decided instead what that, with a far clearer 
explanation of processes on the ICANN website, registrants should be able to 
better understand the process, including what the rules provide.  And when 
their registrar should take action (under the RAA) but doesn’t, the registrant 
can to to ICANN compliance and ask that the registrar be required to take 
action.  The first sentence in the report seems to imply more.

Thanks

Holly

On 14 Aug 2014, at 4:57 pm, Lars Hoffmann <Lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> <IRTP-DFinalReport_V2.doc>