Re: [gnso-lockdomainname-dt] Re: [gnso-lockdomainname-dt] Next meeting of the DT on Tuesday 7 February at 19.30 UTC

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Andrii,

In relation to your last comment, this sentence has been derived from the GNSO 
Working Group Guidelines which specify that "In addition, the Chair should be 
able to ensure that anyone joining a Working Group after it has begun has 
reviewed all documents and mailing list postings and agrees not to reopen 
previously decided questions. However, if there is support from the Chair to 
reopen an issue in light of new information that is provided either by a new 
member or an existing member of the Working Group, this should be possible". It 
specifically relates to members that join a WG after it has already started its 
work. I hope this clarifies this specific reference.

With best regards,

Marika

From: Andrii Paziuk <pazval@xxxxxxx<mailto:pazval@xxxxxxx>>
Reply-To: Andrii Paziuk <pazval@xxxxxxx<mailto:pazval@xxxxxxx>>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 04:15:03 -0800
To: "gnso-lockdomainname-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-lockdomainname-dt@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-lockdomainname-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-lockdomainname-dt@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-lockdomainname-dt] Re: [gnso-lockdomainname-dt] Next meeting of 
the DT on Tuesday 7 February at 19.30 UTC

Hi,

Dear members,

I applogies for not participating in previous meeting. A few words about 
myself: I am Fellow in the International Law Chair
Institute of International Relations Taras Shevchenko National University in 
Ukraine.
My field of study is Internet Governance issues. I participate in this groupe 
to gain experience of international collaboration and to contribute and 
practice the bottom up model of governance.

I would like to thanks Marika for the draft of such high quality. My concern is 
the membership criteria as described in Section III:
'The Working Group will be open to all interested in participating. New members 
who join after work has been completed will need to review previous documents 
and meeting transcripts'.
May I propose the approach that reflects the multistakeholder model and 
participation in the working group representatives from different stakeholder 
groups. I propose to add the sentence: 'The participation of representatives 
from different constituencies is encouraged'.
Also I don't understand the legal sense of participation in the WG after work 
has been completed and recommendations for new members to review previous 
documents and meeting transcripts.
Thanks

Andrii


---------------------------------------
Andrii Paziuk
Fellow, International Law Chair
Institute of International Relations
Taras Shevchenko National University
pazval@xxxxxxx<mailto:pazval@xxxxxxx>; 
inet.media.law@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:inet.media.law@xxxxxxxxx>
+380504418354



03 февраля 2012, 12:19 от Marika Konings 
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>:
Dear All,

The next meeting of the Locking of a Domain Name Subject to UDRP Proceedings DT 
will take place on Tuesday 7 February at 19.30 UTC. The call details will be 
circulated shortly. I would like to encourage everyone, and especially those of 
you that cannot make the meeting, to share your comments, edits and / or 
questions on the draft charter template (see attached) with the mailing list in 
advance of the call.

Thanks,

Marika

From: Marika Konings 
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<sentmsg?compose&To=marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 06:06:12 -0800
To: 
"gnso-lockdomainname-dt@xxxxxxxxx<sentmsg?compose&To=gnso-lockdomainname-dt@xxxxxxxxx>"
 
<gnso-lockdomainname-dt@xxxxxxxxx<sentmsg?compose&To=gnso-lockdomainname-dt@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-lockdomainname-dt] First draft of charter template for your 
review

Dear All,

Having reviewed the other charters recently developed using the charter 
template and taking into account the new GNSO PDP, I've prepared a first draft 
of the Charter for the Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings PDP 
Working Group for your consideration. The DT might want to consider using this 
as a starting point for further discussions on the development of the Charter. 
Please feel free to share any comments, edits and/or questions you may have 
with the mailing list.

We are still in the process of trying to nail down a time for the next meeting, 
so if you have not done so yet, please go to the doodle poll and confirm your 
availability (for those that already filled it in, please note that as of 
yesterday another option has been added, so you may edit your entry as 
appropriate): http://www.doodle.com/82tf9n9hfbe93kqh.

Thanks,

Marika