Re: {Disarmed} RE: [gnso-lockdomainname-dt] Call for volunteers for the Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group for the Locking of a Domain Name Subject to UDRP Proceedings

["Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think I got added already, but in case anyone is wondering … I did ask to be 
added :)

Regards

Michele


On 26 Mar 2012, at 14:25, Jonathan Tenenbaum wrote:

> Hi Glen:
>  
> Please add me to the team as well.  Thanks!
>  
> -Jonathan
>  
> Jonathan D. Tenenbaum, Esq.
> Corporate Counsel
> Web.com Group, Inc.
> P: 570-706-7049
> F: 570-706-7193
> E: jtenenbaum@xxxxxxx
> MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from ".." claiming to be 
> www.web.com
>  
> <image001.png>
>  
> From: owner-gnso-lockdomainname-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-lockdomainname-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Konstantinos 
> Komaitis
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 5:07 AM
> To: 'Marika Konings'; Glen de Saint Géry; gnso-lockdomainname-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-lockdomainname-dt] Call for volunteers for the Policy 
> Development Process (PDP) Working Group for the Locking of a Domain Name 
> Subject to UDRP Proceedings
>  
> Hi Glen,
>  
> Can you please add my name on this team?
>  
> Thanks
>  
> Konstantinos
>  
> Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
>  
> Senior Lecturer,
> Director of Postgraduate Instructional Courses
> Director of LLM Information Technology and Telecommunications Law
> University of Strathclyde,
> The Law School,
> Graham Hills building,
> 50 George Street, Glasgow G1 1BA
> UK
> tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306
> http://www.routledgemedia.com/books/The-Current-State-of-Domain-Name-Regulation-isbn9780415477765
> Selected publications: 
> http://hq.ssrn.com/submissions/MyPapers.cfm?partid=501038
> Website: www.komaitis.org
>  
> From: owner-gnso-lockdomainname-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-lockdomainname-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
> Sent: Δευτέρα, 26 Μαρτίου 2012 10:01 πμ
> To: Glen de Saint Géry; gnso-lockdomainname-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-lockdomainname-dt] Call for volunteers for the Policy 
> Development Process (PDP) Working Group for the Locking of a Domain Name 
> Subject to UDRP Proceedings
>  
> All, if you are interested in joining the Locking of a Domain Name Subject to 
> UDRP Proceedings Working Group, please inform Glen accordingly. Members of 
> the Drafting Team are not added automatically. 
>  
> With best regards,
>  
> Marika
>  
> From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:50:04 -0700
> To: "gnso-lockdomainname-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-lockdomainname-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [gnso-lockdomainname-dt] Call for volunteers for the Policy 
> Development Process (PDP) Working Group for the Locking of a Domain Name 
> Subject to UDRP Proceedings
>  
> Dear All,
>  
> http://gnso.icann.org/announcements/announcement-16mar12-en.htm
> Please distribute to your members the call for volunteers  for the Policy 
> Development Process (PDP) Working Group  for the  Locking of a Domain Name 
> Subject to UDRP Proceedings.
> In Brief
> 
> The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council seeks volunteers to 
> serve on a Working Group that will address the locking of a domain name 
> subject to Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) proceedings. After 
> investigating and considering specific issues (detailed below), the Working 
> Group is expected to make recommendations to the GNSO Council to address the 
> issues identified with the locking of a domain name subject to UDRP 
> Proceedings.
> 
> What This Group Will Do
> 
> The PDP Working Group should, as a first step, request public input on this 
> issue in order to have a clear understanding of the exact nature and scope of 
> issues encountered with the locking of a domain name subject to UDRP 
> Proceedings. Based on this information, and its own views, and any additional 
> information gathering the Working Group deems necessary, the PDP Working 
> Group is expected to make recommendations to the GNSO Council to address the 
> issues identified with the locking of a domain name subject to UDRP 
> Proceedings.
> 
> As part of the WG deliberations, it is suggested that the WG considers, 
> amongst other, the following:
> 
> ·         1. Whether the creation of an outline of a proposed procedure, 
> which a complainant must follow in order for a registrar to place a domain 
> name on registrar lock, would be desirable.
> ·         2. Whether the creation of an outline of the steps of the process 
> that a registrar can reasonably expect to take place during a UDRP dispute 
> would be desirable.
> ·         3. Whether the time frame by which a registrar must lock a domain 
> after a UDRP has been filed should be standardized.
> ·         4a. Whether what constitutes a "locked" domain name should be 
> defined.
> ·         4b. Whether, once a domain name is 'locked' pursuant to a UDRP 
> proceeding, the registrant information for that domain name may be changed or 
> modified.
> ·         5. Whether additional safeguards should be created for the 
> protection of registrants in cases where the domain name is locked subject to 
> a UDRP proceeding.
> For further details, see the WG Charter.
> 
> How This Group Will Work
> 
> ICANN Working Groups use transparent, open processes. The meetings of this WG 
> will be recorded, and the recordings will be available to the public. The 
> mailing list for the Locking of a Domain Name Subject to UDRP Proceedings WG 
> will be archived publicly. Working Group members are expected to submit 
> Statements of Interest (SOI). The group will collaborate using a public 
> workspace. The Working Group is expected to follow theGNSO Working Group 
> Guidelines.
> 
> How to Join
> 
> The Council invites interested parties to provide names of expected 
> participants who can then be added to the WG mailing list. The GNSO Council 
> may also invite stakeholders and experts to join. Community members who wish 
> to be invited to join the group should contact the GNSO secretariat 
> (gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxx). This WG is already forming; please apply 
> promptly.
> 
> Background
> 
> At its 15 December meeting, the GNSO Council initiated a PDP on the 
> requirement to lock a domain name subject to UDRP proceedings.
> 
> A discussion on the requirements of locking a domain name subject to UDRP 
> proceedings was initially conducted as part of the Inter-Registrar Transfer 
> Part B PDP. As a result of that process, it was noted that "that locking a 
> domain name registration subject to a UDRP dispute should be a best practice" 
> however, the WG "noted that any changes to making this a requirement should 
> be considered in the context of any potential UDRP review." Subsequently, 
> several community members called out this issue in their comments on the 
> state of the UDRP Issue Report published in October 2011, and as a result, 
> the GNSO Council initiated a PDP on this specific issue only. A sample of the 
> community comments is below:
> 
> ·         "No requirement to lock names in period between filing complaint 
> and commencement of proceedings."
> ·         "Need clarification of domain locking."
> ·         "Unclear what is meant by "Status Quo."
> ·         "No explanation of 'Legal Lock' mechanisms and when they go into 
> effect or when they should be removed."
> Thank you.
> Kind regards,
> Glen
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://gnso.icann.org
>  

Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions ♞
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
ICANN Accredited Registrar
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://blacknight.biz
http://mneylon.tel
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
US: 213-233-1612 
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Facebook: http://fb.me/blacknight
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845