RE: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] Proposed agenda UDRP Domain Name Lock WG meeting

[Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you for this David, I will note your apology for the next few weeks.

Kindest regards

Nathalie

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Roache-Turner, David
Sent: jeudi 28 février 2013 16:04
To: Dorrain, Kristine; Marika Konings
Cc: Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx; Gray, Ty
Subject: RE: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] Proposed agenda UDRP Domain Name Lock WG meeting


Agree, fine work indeed Marika - also with apologies that I won't be able to 
make today's call (although WIPO colleague Ty Gray, copied) should be able to 
stand in for me.  Ty will also be covering for me for the next few weeks, due 
to a brief period of leave.

Best,
David


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Dorrain, Kristine
Sent: jeudi, 28. février 2013 15:54
To: Marika Konings
Cc: Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] Proposed agenda UDRP Domain Name Lock WG meeting


My apologies, I won't be able to make the call today, Marika, excellent job on 
the final proposal.

Kristine

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 28, 2013, at 5:36 AM, "Marika Konings" 
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

All, based on the feedback received from Matt and Luc, please find attached an 
updated version of the straw man proposal. Please note that I've made one 
additional change and that is to replace 'underlying registrant' with the term 
'proxy customer or "beneficial user"' which I've been told are the accurate 
terms to use as under the RAA the proxy is the "real registrant". In relation 
to recommendation #10, I've put in between brackets the language that I believe 
Luc would like to see removed (the WG may want to discuss whether the other 
parts of the recommendation should also be removed or not, but these seem to 
provide a useful clarification of what the different parties can expect to 
happen in the case of a settlement).

With best regards,

Marika

From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday 27 February 2013 16:19
To: "Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] Proposed agenda UDRP Domain Name Lock WG meeting

Dear All,

Please find below the proposed agenda for tomorrow's UDRP Domain Name Lock WG 
meeting. As a reminder, please send any comments / edits you may have on the 
straw man proposal (see latest version attached) to the mailing list prior to 
the meeting.

Thanks,

Marika

Proposed Agenda - UDRP Domain Name Lock Working Group Meeting 28 February 2013

  1.  Roll Call / SOI Updates
  2.  Review of latest version of straw man proposal (see attached)
  3.  Review of latest version of Initial Report (see attached)
  4.  Confirm Deadline for submission of comments on the Initial Report
  5.  Next steps / confirm next meeting

<Final Straw Man Proposal - Updated 28 February 2013.doc>



World Intellectual Property Organization Disclaimer: This electronic message 
may contain privileged, confidential and copyright protected information. If 
you have received this e-mail by mistake, please immediately notify the sender 
and delete this e-mail and all its attachments. Please ensure all e-mail 
attachments are scanned for viruses prior to opening or using.