[gnso-lockpdp-wg] For your review - updated version of Initial Report
All, Please find attached for your review an updated version of the Initial Report which now incorporates the straw man proposal in addition to some other edits and updates to reflect recent discussions (all in redline). Some of the open items that the WG may want to review at its next meeting are: * Assessing level of consensus for the preliminary recommendations * Expected impact of the proposed recommendations * Proposed procedure in the case of settlement: Option A (proposed by Luc) - (1) parties ask for suspension, (2) parties settle, (3) parties inform provider, (4) provider issues order to registrar to change the holder details or delete the domain name (5) that change or deletion happens, (6) complainant confirms change or deletion is complete, and (7) provider dismisses case - Option B (proposed by Kristine) - (1) parties ask for suspension (suspension request includes automatic dismissal when the suspension period is up), (2) provider issues order allowing registrar to unlock for the sole purpose of (whatever the settlement is), (2) parties settle, (3) parties request the registrar to unlock (not to manage anything further, like terms, just unlock to allow transfer), and (4) provider dismisses case automatically with no further action needed (if settlement discussions break down, either party can request that the case be reinstated before automatic dismissal). You are encouraged to share any additional issues, edits and/or comments you may have with the mailing list. With best regards, Marika Attachment:
UDRP Domain Name Lock Initial Report - Updated 5 March 2013.doc Attachment:
smime.p7s |