<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] Proposed agenda - UDRP Domain Name Lock WG meeting
- To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] Proposed agenda - UDRP Domain Name Lock WG meeting
- From: Gabriela Szlak <gabrielaszlak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 02:58:45 -0300
Dear all,
I am sorry that I won´t be able to join you for tomorrow´s call.
Please accept my apologies.
Gabi
--
*Gabriela Szlak *
Regional Director
RED/ODR & eGobernanza (IG)
*eInstituto <http://www.einstituto.org> *
25 de mayo 611 Piso 3º - C1002ABM
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires - Argentina
(+54 11) 4878-0179
*Twitte:* @gabiszlak
*Skype:* gabrielaszlak
odr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
egobernanza@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2013/3/6 Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> Dear All,
>
> Please find below the proposed agenda for the next UDRP Domain Name Lock
> WG Meeting (7 March at 15.00 UTC).
>
> With best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> *Proposed Agenda – UDRP Domain Name Lock Working Group Meeting 7 March
> 2013*****
>
> 1. Roll Call / SOI Updates****
> 2. Review of latest version of Initial Report (see attached), including:
>
>
> - Assessing level of consensus for the preliminary recommendations
> - Expected impact of the proposed recommendations
> - Proposed procedure in the case of settlement: *Option A* (proposed
> by Luc) - (1) parties ask for suspension, (2) parties settle, (3)
> parties inform provider, (4) provider issues order to registrar to change
> the holder details or delete the domain name (5) that change or
> deletion happens, (6) complainant confirms change or deletion is complete,
> and (7) provider dismisses case - *Option B *(proposed by
> Kristine) - (1) parties ask for suspension (suspension request includes
> automatic dismissal when the suspension period is up), (2) provider issues
> order allowing registrar to unlock for the sole purpose of (whatever the
> settlement is), (2) parties settle, (3) parties request the registrar to
> unlock (not to manage anything further, like terms, just unlock to allow
> transfer), and (4) provider dismisses case automatically with no further
> action needed (if settlement discussions break down, either party can
> request that the case be reinstated before automatic dismissal)*.*
>
> 3. Confirm deadline for submission of comments on the Initial Report
> 4. Next steps / confirm next meeting
>
> ** **
>
--
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|