ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-lockpdp-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] Proposed agenda - UDRP Domain Name Lock WG meeting

  • To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] Proposed agenda - UDRP Domain Name Lock WG meeting
  • From: Gabriela Szlak <gabrielaszlak@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 02:58:45 -0300

Dear all,

I am sorry that I won´t be able to join you for tomorrow´s call.
Please accept my apologies.
Gabi


-- 

*Gabriela Szlak  *
Regional Director

RED/ODR & eGobernanza (IG)

*eInstituto <http://www.einstituto.org> *
25 de mayo 611 Piso 3º  - C1002ABM
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires - Argentina
(+54 11) 4878-0179
*Twitte:* @gabiszlak

*Skype:* gabrielaszlak
odr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

egobernanza@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx




2013/3/6 Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>

> Dear All,
>
> Please find below the proposed agenda for the next UDRP Domain Name Lock
> WG Meeting (7 March at 15.00 UTC).
>
> With best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> *Proposed Agenda – UDRP Domain Name Lock Working Group Meeting 7 March
> 2013*****
>
> 1. Roll Call / SOI Updates****
> 2. Review of latest version of Initial Report (see attached), including:
>
>
>    - Assessing level of consensus for the preliminary recommendations
>    - Expected impact of the proposed recommendations
>    - Proposed procedure in the case of settlement: *Option A* (proposed
>    by Luc) - (1) parties ask for suspension, (2) parties settle, (3)
>    parties inform provider, (4) provider issues order to registrar to change
>    the holder details or delete the domain name (5) that change or
>    deletion happens, (6) complainant confirms change or deletion is complete,
>    and (7) provider dismisses case - *Option B *(proposed by
>    Kristine) - (1) parties ask for suspension (suspension request includes
>    automatic dismissal when the suspension period is up), (2) provider issues
>    order allowing registrar to unlock for the sole purpose of (whatever the
>    settlement is), (2) parties settle, (3) parties request the registrar to
>    unlock (not to manage anything further, like terms, just unlock to allow
>    transfer), and (4) provider dismisses case automatically with no further
>    action needed (if settlement discussions break down, either party can
>    request that the case be reinstated before automatic dismissal)*.*
>
> 3. Confirm deadline for submission of comments on the Initial Report
> 4. Next steps / confirm next meeting
>
> ** **
>



--


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy