Re: Reminder: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] For Final Review - Initial Report

[Luc SEUFER <lseufer@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Marika,

The issue I see with the proposed wording is that it implies that the Registrar 
always has full control over the resolution. But in cases where the domain name 
subject to UDRP proceedings is hosted on a third party's name servers, the 
Registrar may not ensure that the domain name will continue to resolve.

Something along the lines of " In this context, the term "lock" means 
preventing any changes of registrar and registrant, without impairing the 
resolution of the domain name".

All the best,

Luc




On 12 Mar 2013, at 12:16 , Marika Konings 
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Reminder: please send any comments / edits and/or suggestions you may have by 
18.00 UTC on Wednesday 13 March at the latest.

One suggestion I would like to make is, after reviewing the URS documents, 
whether it would make sense to add 'but the name will continue to resolve' to 
the proposed definition for 'lock' in the context of the UDRP proceeding as 
this would be in line with the WG deliberations as outlined at the bottom of 
page 26 – top of page 27. Preliminary recommendation #1 would then read: In 
this context, the term "lock" means preventing any changes of registrar and 
registrant, but the name will continue to resolve.

I'm looking forward to receiving your feedback.

With best regards,

Marika

From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Friday 8 March 2013 11:23
To: "Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] For Final Review - Initial Report

Dear All,

As discussed during yesterday's meeting, please find attached the latest 
version of the Initial Report for final review. Note that in addition to some 
minor corrections the following updates have been made:

  *   Added executive summary (see page 3-8)
  *   Added preliminary level of consensus for recommendations ('The Working 
Group appears to have consensus on all the above recommendations. A formal 
consensus call will be conducted once the recommendations are finalized 
following review of the public comments received on this Initial Report' - if 
there is disagreement with this designation, please share your views with the 
mailing list).
  *   Added section on expected impact of recommendations (see page 34)
  *   Added options concerning process for settlement for community input (see 
page 33-34)

Please review this version carefully and share any comments / edits and/or 
suggestions you may have with the mailing list at the latest by 18.00 UTC on 
Wednesday 13 March.

Thanks,

Marika
<UDRP Domain Name Lock Initial Report - Updated 8 March 2013.doc>


________________________________

--------------------------------------------------------

This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have 
received this e-mail by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and 
delete it from your system. You must not copy the message or disclose its 
contents to anyone.

Think of the environment: don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.

--------------------------------------------------------